| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 95.8% | Holder distribution | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% until 22 Sept 2027 | LP holders · UNCX Locker | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 57 | Token contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x275d11…7b04f6 |
| Holders | 57 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x580e59…60ad7d | 72.27% |
| #2 | 0x786fdf…15492b | 9.36% |
| #3 · UNCX Token Vesting · contract · locked | 0xa82685…215e33 | 5.07% |
| #4 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0xba0617…315e40 | 2.58% |
| #5 | 0x2befd5…b3b85d | 2.22% |
This automated check of TPRO on Base returned a score of 12 out of 18, based on contract mechanics observed at the time of scanning. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both set at 0%, and no honeypot behaviour was detected on that date. No admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, and no blacklist capability were found in the contract code, meaning that as written, the contract owner does not appear to retain the ability to mint new tokens, freeze transfers, or block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable via a proxy, so its current logic cannot be silently swapped for different logic later. The source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the code to be read and checked by anyone, and 100% of liquidity is reported locked until 22 September 2027 via UNCX Locker, meaning that portion of liquidity could not be removed before that date according to the locker contract. Against this, top-10 wallets hold 95.8% of total supply across only 57 holders, which is a high concentration — a small number of addresses control the large majority of tokens, and decisions by any of them to sell could affect price and available liquidity for everyone else.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team is anonymous or doxxed, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether marketing claims match reality, or whether there is any legal entity or regulatory registration attached to the token. A clean read on contract mechanics says nothing about intent, roadmap credibility, or whether the project will continue to be developed. Concentrated holdings in particular can still be used to move price sharply even when no honeypot or blacklist function exists in the code itself.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth independently verifying who controls the top wallets and whether any are exchange or team addresses rather than independent holders, checking the liquidity lock directly on the locker contract to confirm the unlock date and locked amount, reviewing the project's own disclosures about team identity and token allocation, and checking trading volume and order book depth on the exchanges or pools where the token actually trades. None of the findings above constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.