Our only asset is that our assessments can be trusted. This page states the rules that protect it. They are not aspirations; they are the terms we operate under.
Not a fee, not a token allocation, not an advertising deal contingent on an outcome. There is no price. Requests of this kind are declined and we keep the record.
No paid placements, no sponsored coin mentions, no affiliate links to specific assets, in any channel we operate. If we ever accept sponsorship, it will be for security tooling only, and it will be labelled.
Depth costs money. Warnings do not. If we find something that could cost people their funds, the finding is published publicly and free.
We do not sell findings. Everything we establish about a project is published free of charge, immediately, and stays published. What you can pay for is a request — putting a project into the queue so that it gets examined at all — and for notifications, access, and work on material you own.
We never disclose who requested a report.
Two services are private by design, because they concern the client's own material and not a third party: Whitepaper Analysis and Grant Proposal Writer.
A project may purchase specific work about itself:
Four conditions apply to all of it, without exception:
Buying facts is legitimate. Buying conclusions is not. This is the line, and it does not move.
If you run a project we have assessed and believe we published something inaccurate, write to [email protected] with the specific claim and the evidence.
Every correction is logged with what changed, when, and why. This applies to our own mistakes as well as to updates driven by new information. The log is public: chainsift.org/corrections.
We would rather be publicly wrong and visibly corrected than quietly wrong.