| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 2% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 2% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 94.4% | Holder distribution | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% permanently | LP holders · Pons | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 236 | Token contract | 9 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe6c111…d4d561 |
| Holders | 236 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 78.63% |
| #2 · Pons locker, locked for good · contract | 0x267444…574952 | 8.16% |
| #3 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 1.25% |
| #4 | 0x22c228…19d7f1 | 1.03% |
| #5 · contract | 0x32918d…07277e | 1.03% |
This automated check found an on-chain score of 11 out of 18 for ORBITAL. In practical terms, a few things stand out. The contract charges a 2% creator tax plus a 1% Pons factory fee on both buys and sells, meaning every trade sends a small cut to the creator and the platform, which reduces the amount a buyer or seller actually receives. No admin mint function, transfer pause, blacklist capability, or upgradeable proxy was detected on the date of this check, which means the contract owner does not appear to retain the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze transfers, block specific wallets, or swap out the contract's logic after deployment. Liquidity is reported as 100% permanently locked, which on its own reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity pool being withdrawn by whoever controls it. Token transfers were simulated and found to be sellable, so no honeypot behaviour — where tokens can be bought but not sold — was detected at the time of testing. One figure worth noting carefully: the top 10 holders control 94.1% of the circulating supply, which is a high concentration and means a small number of wallets could materially affect the market if they chose to sell.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who the team behind ORBITAL is, whether their identities are known or verifiable, how the tokenomics are designed to play out over time, whether any legal or regulatory structure exists around the project, or what the creators actually intend to do. A contract can show no risky functions in its code and still be part of a project with weak fundamentals, an anonymous team, or questionable intent that no automated scan can detect.
Before putting any money in, it would be sensible to look into who is behind the project and whether that information is publicly verifiable, read any available documentation on how the token supply is distributed and whether more is scheduled to unlock, check trading volume and liquidity depth on a block explorer or chain-specific dashboard rather than relying on this snapshot alone, and look at whether the top holders are known entities (such as exchanges or locked team wallets) or unidentified individual wallets. None of this replaces independent research, and this check is not a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid ORBITAL in any way.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.