| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 2% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 2% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Not in a pool yet — Pons bonding curve | Pons factory | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 15 | Token contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x5cd9e3…be0d0e |
| Holders | 15 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x36c328…5a93aa | 96.63% |
| #2 | 0x7d3608…6a7970 | 1.94% |
| #3 · contract | 0x4f3161…f12f46 | 1.01% |
| #4 | 0xfde184…535598 | 0.35% |
| #5 | 0x8ddc00…03b77c | 0.07% |
This automated check looked at DEBT (DebtCoin) on the Robinhood chain and scored 11 out of 18. In practice, that means a few things are confirmed about how the contract behaves, and a few are worth sitting with before deciding anything. Every trade carries a 2% fee that goes to the token's creator, plus a separate 1% fee taken by the Pons platform itself — so buying and selling costs more than the headline price suggests, but this is a running fee, not a mechanism that lets the creator block or freeze your tokens. On the encouraging side, the contract was not found to have an admin mint function, a pause switch, a blacklist tool, or an upgradeable proxy — meaning that, as of the date of this check, nothing was detected that would let the creator create unlimited new tokens, freeze transfers, block specific wallets, or swap in new contract logic later. The source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the code backing these findings is publicly readable. However, the top 10 holders currently control 100% of the supply across only 15 holders total, and the token is still on the Pons bonding curve rather than in a liquidity pool — the pool only gets created and permanently locked once the token "graduates" from the curve. Until that happens, normal exit liquidity as commonly understood on a DEX does not yet exist in the way it would post-graduation.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looked at code and on-chain data, not at who the team behind DebtCoin is, whether they have a track record, what the tokenomics or long-term supply plan look like, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind the project. No human has reviewed this project's intent, and nothing here speaks to whether the people involved plan to act in holders' interests.
Before putting any money toward this token, it would be worth looking at the wallet addresses behind that top-10 concentration to see if they look like one coordinated entity, checking Pons's documentation on how bonding curve graduation and pool locking actually work, searching for any public information about who created DebtCoin, and treating a 100%-concentrated, 15-holder token on an unlaunched pool as still in an early and illiquid phase. None of the above is investment advice, and none of it predicts what happens to this token's price or liquidity going forward.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.