| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 97.6% | Holder distribution | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 837 | Token contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 5 Aug 2022 — 1,492 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x7dfea3…7cda67 |
| Deployed by | 0xd77d46…2e8f0c |
| Current owner | 0xd77d46…2e8f0c |
| Holders | 837 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x7f881c…a66610 | 36.23% |
| #2 | 0xa028ad…2c545d | 18.12% |
| #3 | 0x000000…000001 | 15.10% |
| #4 | 0x597df1…dfef85 | 7.25% |
| #5 | 0x0a65d6…c3ff2f | 7.25% |
This automated check found several contract features that give the token's owner a significant degree of control over how it behaves, and it's worth understanding exactly what each one allows. The contract can pause transfers, meaning the owner has the ability to freeze trading for all holders at any time. It also supports blacklisting, so specific wallet addresses can be blocked from sending or receiving tokens. On top of that, the owner can change balances directly, which means token amounts held in wallets could be altered without the holder's action. No admin mint function was detected on the date of the check, and the buy and sell simulation did not detect honeypot behaviour, with 0% buy and sell tax recorded. However, top-10 wallets hold 97.6% of the supply, a level of concentration that means a small number of holders (potentially including the team) could move large amounts of tokens and affect the market. Liquidity was also found to be unlocked, meaning whoever provided it could withdraw it from the trading pool at any time. The contract source code is verified, which at least means the code is publicly readable and was matched against what the check analysed.
It's important to be clear about what this score does not cover. This check reads contract mechanics only — it looks at what the code technically allows the owner to do, not who the owner is, what their intentions are, or whether they plan to use these powers. It says nothing about the team behind the project, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, legal structure, jurisdiction, or any off-chain promises made in marketing material. A high score here does not mean a project is trustworthy, and a lower score does not confirm wrongdoing — it only reflects technical permissions detected in the contract as of the date of this check.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth looking into who controls the owner wallet and whether it's a multisig or a single key, checking whether there's any public statement about the pause and blacklist functions and why they exist, reviewing the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who holds the LP tokens, and researching the team's public identity and history independently. Given the concentration figures and unlocked liquidity found here, treating this as one input among several — rather than a final answer — is a reasonable approach.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.