Before you buy: How much real money is in the pool, what do you lose selling $1,000, and who can pull it out?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 2% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 2% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 44.6% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 68.7% burned | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 5400 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xeb74fa…d8d82c |
| Holders | 5,400 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0xe56041…4db8c6 | 19.35% |
| #2 · PinkLock02 · contract · locked | 0x407993…ee1bbe | 17.59% |
| #3 | 0x4e0076…9f05a6 | 1.45% |
| #4 | 0x5ed80b…ca4a40 | 1.30% |
| #5 | 0x3d4951…82f977 | 0.99% |
This automated check scanned the AGC contract on BNB Chain and found no honeypot behaviour: a transfer simulation confirmed the token is sellable, and transfers can't be paused or addresses blacklisted, since neither function is present in the code. A transfer tax of up to 2% applies on both buying and selling, meaning a small portion of every trade is deducted automatically by the contract. More significantly, admin mint is enabled, which means the contract owner retains the ability to create new tokens at will, something that can dilute existing holders' share of supply without warning. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so its core logic cannot be swapped out after deployment, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the logic described here is publicly readable rather than hidden. Holder concentration is on the higher side: the top 10 wallets control 44.6% of supply, so trading activity or decisions by a small number of holders could have an outsized effect on price. Liquidity is 68.7% burned, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of that portion of liquidity being pulled.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads only the mechanics written into the smart contract — what functions exist, who can call them, how tokens move. It says nothing about who the team behind AGC is, whether they are identifiable or anonymous, how the remaining liquidity or team-held supply is scheduled to unlock, what the token is meant to be used for, or whether any marketing claims made about it hold up. Intent cannot be inferred from code alone: a mint function can be used for legitimate reasons disclosed elsewhere, or not. None of that is assessed by this automated scan, and no human has reviewed this contract or project.
Before putting money in, it would be sensible to look up who controls the owner wallet and whether mint and other admin functions are time-locked, renounced, or controlled by a multisig rather than a single key. Check whether the project has published tokenomics explaining the purpose of minting and the schedule for any locked liquidity or team tokens. Look for independent discussion of the team's identity and track record, and read the contract's own documentation or audit reports, if any exist, alongside this check rather than instead of it.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.