| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 17 | Token contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x30188c…0c0230 |
| Current owner | 0x660eaa…ba8d12 — Doppler Airlock contract, can’t change this token |
| Holders | 17 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x498581…652b2b | 83.95% |
| #2 · vesting, not yet released · contract | 0xde86c9…51cba3 | 15.00% |
| #3 | 0xb7a206…3678eb | 0.46% |
| #4 | 0x5d47fb…72f9f9 | 0.42% |
| #5 · contract | 0x998253…84fdbb | 0.13% |
This automated check on Supertake (Base chain) returned a score of 12 out of 18, based on contract mechanics read directly from the code and on-chain data at the time of the scan. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, with no honeypot behaviour detected on that date. No admin mint function was found, meaning the contract does not appear to let the owner create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable and no blacklist function was detected, so the owner does not currently have a built-in mechanism to freeze the contract or block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out for different code after deployment. Source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the published code can be read and checked by anyone, though verification alone does not confirm the code is free of risk. Liquidity tied to the launch pool is reported as permanently locked, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of liquidity being pulled by whoever controls that pool. The more significant finding is that the top 10 holders control 100% of supply, across only 18 holders total — this is a high concentration level, meaning a small number of wallets have outsized ability to affect price through coordinated or individual selling, independent of any contract-level permissions.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only: functions present in the code, verification status, holder distribution, and liquidity lock status as recorded on-chain. It says nothing about the team behind the project, their identity, history, or intentions. It does not assess tokenomics design, roadmap credibility, marketing claims, or whether any legal entity stands behind the project. A clean read on contract mechanics does not mean the people involved are trustworthy, and a contract with no detected owner privileges can still be part of a project with weak or absent fundamentals.
Before putting any money in, it's worth looking at who the top holders actually are — whether they're exchange or liquidity wallets versus individual addresses — since concentration this high means a handful of sellers could move the price substantially. It's also worth checking the Doppler factory lock terms directly rather than relying on a label, confirming the lock duration and conditions in the explorer. Searching for the team's public presence, any audit reports, and community discussion of the project separately from this contract scan would also fill gaps this check cannot address. Buy and sell tax data was not available in this scan, so testing a small transaction size before committing larger amounts may surface fees or slippage not captured here.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.