| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 55.3% | Holder distribution | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% permanently | LP holders · Clanker | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 194593 | Token contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x29c324…20799d |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 194,593 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0xd01372…d778f8 | 14.81% |
| #2 · contract | 0x2a70a4…5dc89a | 13.80% |
| #3 · contract | 0x295848…b021bc | 12.93% |
| #4 · contract | 0xd5c733…2d9e4e | 3.00% |
| #5 | 0xffe495…f902ec | 2.35% |
This automated check looked at the contract code for ₸USD on Base and compared it against a set of mechanics that are commonly used to trap or disadvantage holders. On the date of this check, no mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens at will and dilute existing holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner does not appear able to freeze transfers. No blacklist function was detected, meaning there's no sign the owner can block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, so its rules cannot be swapped out later via a proxy. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both at 0%, meaning no indication of a honeypot setup where tokens can be bought but not resold. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, so the code is publicly readable rather than hidden. Liquidity is reported as 100% permanently locked, which reduces the likelihood of the pooled funds being withdrawn by whoever added them. One point of concentration stands out: the top 10 holders control 55.3% of supply, which means a small number of wallets could move a large share of tokens at once, something that can affect price independent of any contract mechanic.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It reads only the contract's code and on-chain data — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team is anonymous, how tokens were originally distributed to those top holders, what the stated purpose or roadmap is, or whether any claims made about the project elsewhere are accurate. A contract can score well on mechanics like this one while still being tied to a team with no track record, a marketing push disconnected from any real activity, or arrangements that fall outside what code alone can reveal. This is an automated read of contract behaviour, not a judgement on the people or business behind the token.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who holds those concentrated top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, checking whether the project has any public documentation, social presence, or history beyond this contract, searching the contract address and project name for independent discussion or reporting, and confirming the liquidity lock through the lock provider's own page rather than relying on a single data point. None of this replaces your own judgement, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.