| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 1% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 1% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 50.1% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% permanently | LP holders · Pons | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 812 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x5aa60d…aad601 |
| Holders | 812 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 16.05% |
| #2 · Pons locker, locked for good · contract | 0x267444…574952 | 8.16% |
| #3 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 6.51% |
| #4 | 0x2f7bf7…8e70bf | 5.31% |
| #5 | 0xef5e2d…13081f | 3.76% |
This automated check found that SABLE's contract allows selling, based on a transfer simulation carried out on the date of this check. No admin mint function, transfer pause function, address blacklist, or upgradeable proxy was detected in the contract code at the time of review — meaning the owner does not currently have a built-in method to freeze your tokens, mint new supply out of thin air, or swap out the contract's logic after the fact. A 1% creator tax plus a 1% Pons platform fee applies on both buys and sells, which is taken automatically on each trade rather than set arbitrarily by the owner after you hold the token. The liquidity pool is reported as 100% permanently locked, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity being pulled out from under holders. Taken together, these are mechanical indicators read directly from the contract and its on-chain data — they describe what the code currently permits, not what will happen.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It says nothing about who is behind Sable Network, whether the team has a track record, how tokens were distributed at launch, what the stated use case or roadmap is, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind the project. Top-10 wallets holding 50.1% of supply is flagged here only as a concentration metric — it does not indicate who those wallets belong to, whether they are exchanges, locked team allocations, or independent holders, and it says nothing about intent to sell. Contract mechanics can look clean while a project's broader economics or governance still carry significant risk, and the reverse is also possible.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking into who holds those top-10 wallets and whether any are labelled on a block explorer as exchanges, locked contracts, or team addresses, since concentrated holdings can still be sold into the market even without any contract-level restriction. It's also worth checking the project's own communications, website, and social presence for consistency, looking at how long the contract and liquidity lock have existed, and checking whether the lock is verifiable through the locker platform itself rather than taken on trust. Searching the contract address and team names for prior history or complaints is also a reasonable step. None of this check constitutes financial advice, and the findings above reflect only what was detected in the contract on the date of the check — they are not a verdict on the project as a whole.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.