| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 79.5% | Holder distribution | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 283 | Token contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x1b37d3…80b69a |
| Current owner | 0xeb7c03…ad0862 — Doppler Airlock contract, can’t change this token |
| Holders | 283 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 55.96% |
| #2 | 0x08461a…ff7cfd | 4.40% |
| #3 | 0x09a8e3…f7f9a9 | 3.47% |
| #4 | 0xc004fd…ecd89f | 3.21% |
| #5 | 0x6ccb3d…e429df | 2.88% |
This automated check on BORED scored 13 out of 18. In practical terms, the contract was found to be sellable in a transfer simulation, meaning the token is not currently exhibiting honeypot behaviour that would trap buyers after purchase. No buy or sell tax was detected, so a trade is not siphoning off value on either side at this time. No admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no address blacklist capability and no upgradeable proxy were found in the contract code as checked — this means the contract owner was not detected to have the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze a wallet's transfers, block specific addresses from trading, or swap out the contract's logic after launch. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so the actual logic behind the token can be read by anyone, and the launch liquidity pool is reported as permanently locked, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of liquidity being pulled by whoever controls that pool.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. This is a purely mechanical read of the contract's code and on-chain state as of the date of the check — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of other tokens, what the roadmap or stated use case is, how tokens were allocated or vested, or whether any off-chain promises are being kept. A clean contract can still sit under a team with no real plans, and a contract with flags can still have reasonable explanations. Intent, reputation and legal structure sit entirely outside the scope of this check.
One figure here stands out and deserves attention on its own: the top 10 holders control 79.5% of the supply, across only 283 holders total. That is a high concentration level, meaning a small number of wallets have the ability to move a large share of supply at once, which can affect the token's price and liquidity if they choose to sell.
Before putting money in, it would be reasonable to look up who those top holders are and whether any are known exchange, liquidity, or team wallets, to search independently for the team's identity and track record, to read whatever documentation or community channels exist for bored.place, to check the liquidity lock details directly on the Doppler factory contract rather than relying on a summary, and to treat any findings here as one input alongside your own research rather than a final verdict.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.