| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 89.3% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1369 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x6eb3bd…53ebc0 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x4c7d40…6498a6 — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x76bc13…a94652 |
| Holders | 1,369 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x4c7d40…6498a6 | 79.56% |
| #2 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 6.74% |
| #3 | 0x3b2dde…e7df7a | 0.44% |
| #4 | 0xa70237…7047f3 | 0.42% |
| #5 | 0x2ac4d7…a08b82 | 0.38% |
This automated check scored 旺柴 (WangChai) 11 out of 18, and a few of the findings are worth understanding properly before deciding anything. The contract includes a blacklist function, which means whoever controls the owner wallet can block specific addresses from transacting with the token — in practice, that could include a holder's own wallet. More significantly, this contract uses an upgradeable proxy, which means a single wallet has the power to replace the entire underlying code at any point, including any of the protections or behaviours listed in this report. That's a broad capability: it means the rules governing this token are not fixed and could change without the holder's consent. On the positive side, no admin mint function or transfer-pausing mechanism was detected in the implementation code as it stands, and the simulation found the token sellable with 0% buy and sell tax at the time of the check. The contract source is also verified on the block explorer, which allows the code to be read by anyone.
Two other findings stand out. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplies the trading pool could withdraw it, which would affect the ability to sell. And the top 10 holders control 89.3% of the supply, a highly concentrated distribution across 1,369 holders — large coordinated selling by a small number of wallets could affect the market for everyone else.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at what the code permits, not what the people behind the token intend to do with it. It says nothing about who the team is, whether they're identifiable or anonymous, how the tokenomics are structured long-term, whether there's any legal entity behind the project, or the project's actual plans. No human has reviewed this token or its surrounding claims, and none of this constitutes an assessment of trustworthiness.
Before putting any money in, it would be worth independently verifying who holds the owner/admin wallet and whether it's a multisig or a single key, checking whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by a known, reputable address, looking at how the top holders acquired their tokens and whether any are exchange or team wallets, searching for the project's social channels and any audit reports, and confirming current liquidity depth and lock status directly on-chain, since conditions can change after this check was run.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.