PIZZA On-Chain Risk Check

Pizza · Robinhood Chain · 0xd086f891229cd123aadfcae7c4b40150a80fd9d7
15 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 29 Oct 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 29 Oct 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 29 Oct 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 29 Oct 2026
Admin mint Not present Contract 29 Oct 2026
Transfers pausable Into one pool address only Doppler token code 29 Oct 2026
Address blacklist Not present Contract 29 Oct 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 29 Oct 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 29 Oct 2026
Top-10 holders 40.4% Holder distribution 29 Oct 2026
Liquidity locked Launch pool, permanently Doppler factory 29 Oct 2026
Holders 3227 Token contract 29 Oct 2026

This contract — PIZZA

Deployed by0xf1542d…ef2ce5
Current owner0xeb7c03…ad0862 — Doppler Airlock contract, owned by Doppler’s multisig
Holders3,227

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract 0x8366a3…e40951 19.45%
#2 · burned 0x000000…00dead 10.00%
#3 0x430b3a…35a74b 1.85%
#4 · contract 0x25bcb3…90f94e 1.71%
#5 · contract 0x2f25b9…5778da 1.48%

What this means

This automated check scored PIZZA 15 out of 18 on contract mechanics for the Robinhood chain, and it's worth translating what that actually covers. A transfer simulation found the token sellable at the time of the check, with 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected, meaning no fee was taken on either side of a trade. No admin mint function was found, so the contract as written does not give the owner a way to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No blacklist function was detected, so there's no mechanism found for the owner to block a specific wallet from trading. The one flag that needs unpacking is the pausable transfer function tied to Doppler's Airlock system: the owner can block transfers into one pool address, and at launch that's pointed at the migration pool, which doesn't affect ordinary trading. However, Doppler's multisig retains the technical ability to redirect that block to the trading pool itself, which would stop sales if exercised. This hasn't happened and wasn't detected as active at the time of the check, but the capability exists in the code. Liquidity in the launch pool was found to be permanently locked, and the contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable rather than hidden. Holder concentration is moderate-to-high: the top 10 wallets hold 40.4% of supply across 3,227 holders, which means a small number of addresses could move a large share of the token if they chose to sell at once.

None of this tells you anything about who is behind the project, what the stated use case or roadmap is, how the token supply is allocated or scheduled to unlock, whether marketing claims match what's deployed, or whether there is any legal entity standing behind it. This check reads contract code and on-chain data only, automatically, on the date shown — it does not assess the team, their intentions, or the economic design of the token beyond what's encoded in the contract itself. A clean mechanical read does not speak to whether the project is being run honestly.

Before putting money in, it's worth looking up who controls the Doppler multisig mentioned above and whether that's disclosed anywhere, checking whether the team is publicly identified or anonymous, reading whatever documentation or whitepaper exists for how tokens are allocated and whether any wallets (including the top holders) are subject to vesting, and checking independent discussion of the project outside of its own channels. Re-running this kind of check periodically is also sensible, since contract permissions and holder concentration can change after launch.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Robinhood Chain block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 29 Oct 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.