SI On-Chain Risk Check

Super Inu · Robinhood Chain · 0xabd222d3805642e056b807bb0fd69e155809f473
11 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 29 Oct 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes ChainSift simulation 29 Oct 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 29 Oct 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 29 Oct 2026
Admin mint Not found Implementation code 29 Oct 2026
Transfers pausable Not found Implementation code 29 Oct 2026
Address blacklist Enabled Implementation code 29 Oct 2026
Upgradeable proxy Yes — a single wallet can replace the code Proxy contract 29 Oct 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 29 Oct 2026
Top-10 holders 74.6% Holder distribution 29 Oct 2026
Liquidity locked No LP holders 29 Oct 2026
Holders 19325 Token contract 29 Oct 2026

This contract — SI

Deployed by0x54b5d8…912cfb
Code can be replaced by0xe18146…78b641 — a single wallet
Current code0x2aaa0d…a10159
Holders19,325

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 0xe18146…78b641 66.99%
#2 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract 0x8366a3…e40951 3.09%
#3 0x8d9ae9…2c4122 0.62%
#4 0x7580a9…01c06c 0.60%
#5 0x86fbcd…4c6d4e 0.60%

What this means

This automated check scanned the SI (Super Inu) contract on the Robinhood chain and found a few mechanics worth understanding before deciding anything. The contract allows blacklisting, meaning the owner retains the ability to block specific wallet addresses from transacting with the token — including potentially yours, after you hold it. More significantly, the contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern, which means a single wallet can replace the entire contract code at any time, including any of the protections or limits currently in place. In practice, this means that even if current buy and sell taxes are 0% and no minting or pausing functions were found today, none of that is fixed — the controlling wallet could introduce them later without needing holder approval. Holder concentration is also high: the top 10 wallets control 74.6% of supply, meaning large coordinated sells by a small group could move the market significantly. On the positive side, no honeypot behaviour was detected — the simulation showed the token can currently be sold — and the contract source is verified on the explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable rather than hidden. Liquidity is not locked, however, which means whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it at any time, which is a separate risk from the token contract itself.

It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it checks what the code technically allows, not who controls it, why, or what they intend to do with that control. It says nothing about the team behind Super Inu, their track record, the project's tokenomics or supply schedule, any legal structure, marketing claims, or roadmap. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be attached to a project with no real activity, or score poorly on mechanics while being run by a transparent, communicative team. Mechanics and intent are different questions, and this tool only answers the first one.

Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who holds the upgrade and blacklist privileges — many projects publish the admin wallet address, and you can check whether it's a single private key or a multisignature setup requiring several approvals. Look at whether the team has disclosed their identity, check the liquidity pool directly on-chain to see how much is there and who added it, and search for any history of contract upgrades already performed. Community discussion, audit reports from named firms, and the project's own documentation are also worth reading directly rather than relying on marketing summaries.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Robinhood Chain block explorer. Upgrade rights, the functions of the current code and the trade simulation are read by ChainSift directly from Robinhood Chain — our data source doesn't analyse upgradeable contracts. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 29 Oct 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.