| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No data | Transfer simulation | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x96ed7c…929b12 |
This automated check looked at the TERA contract's code on the date shown and found no admin mint function, no transfer-pause switch, and no blacklist capability recorded. In practical terms, that means the owner was not found to hold the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, to freeze everyone's transfers, or to block specific wallets from moving their holdings. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, meaning the logic behind it cannot be silently swapped for different logic later, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, so anyone can read the actual code behind the token rather than relying on claims about it. The score of 4 out of 4 reflects that none of the specific risk indicators this tool looks for were detected — it does not mean the contract was given a clean bill of health in any broader sense.
A few fields are marked "no data" rather than "not present," and that distinction matters. Sellability, buy tax, and sell tax could not be confirmed from the data source used here, so the check cannot tell you whether this token can actually be resold, or what cut might be taken on a buy or sell. Treat these as unknowns, not as reassurances.
It's also worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract mechanics only — the literal code and whether certain functions exist. It says nothing about who is behind the project, how tokens are distributed among holders, whether liquidity is locked or could be pulled, what the team has said publicly, or whether the overall setup amounts to something exploitative. A contract can score well on every mechanical check here and still be tied to a project with concentrated holdings, undisclosed team control, or no real liquidity behind it.
Before putting any money toward TERA, it would be worth checking the liquidity pool directly to see whether it's locked and for how long, looking at a holder distribution chart to see how concentrated ownership is, and searching for independent information about the team or entity behind the project rather than relying solely on their own claims. Given that sellability and tax data weren't available from this check, it would also be sensible to find that information from another source before assuming you'd be able to exit a position. None of this constitutes investment advice, and this check does not predict price movement or indicate future performance.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 4 points out of 100.
The other 96 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.