| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% creator tax + 1% Pons fee | Pons factory | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 43.1% | Holder distribution | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% permanently | LP holders · Pons | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 628 | Token contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xae412d…0f079f |
| Holders | 628 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 9.20% |
| #2 · Pons locker, locked for good · contract | 0x267444…574952 | 8.58% |
| #3 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 4.20% |
| #4 | 0x9b04a9…f57244 | 4.09% |
| #5 | 0x11c9ff…fd69e4 | 3.28% |
This automated check looked at DUEL's contract mechanics on the Robinhood chain and scored 16 out of 18, based on the findings below as of the date of this check. Selling was confirmed working through a transfer simulation, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected — the contract does not appear to block holders from selling their tokens. Buy and sell taxes were found at 0% creator tax plus a 1% Pons factory fee each way, which is a small, fixed protocol-level fee rather than a tax the token creator can adjust. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the owner does not appear to retain a method to create new tokens and dilute existing holders. Transfers are not pausable and no blacklist function was found, meaning the contract does not currently give the owner the ability to freeze trading or block specific wallets. The contract is not upgradeable, so its code cannot be swapped out for different logic later. Liquidity is reported as 100% permanently locked, which reduces (though does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity pool being withdrawn by whoever controls it. Source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the contract's logic is publicly readable rather than hidden.
One point worth flagging on its own: the top 10 holders control 43.2% of supply across 637 total holders. This is a concentration figure, not a judgement — it simply means a relatively small number of wallets hold a large share of tokens, which can affect how the market behaves if any of them sell in size.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — nothing here has been reviewed by a person, and nothing here evaluates the people behind the project, their intentions, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether marketing claims match reality, or whether any legal or regulatory structure exists around the token. A contract can score well on mechanics like this one while still carrying risks this check has no way to see, such as a team abandoning a project or holding undisclosed control through other means.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who the team behind PromptDuel is and whether they're identifiable, what the token is actually meant to be used for, how the current 637 holders obtained their tokens and whether large allocations are vested or free to sell immediately, where liquidity sits relative to total market value, and whether the project has any independent commentary, audits, or community discussion beyond its own channels. Checking the liquidity lock details directly on Pons, rather than relying on a single figure, is also a reasonable next step.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.