Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x2db5e2…1201a3 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x2db5e2…1201a3 — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0xe85b8d…11e06c |
This automated check of the ROBINCAT contract scored 11 out of 12, which reflects the absence of several commonly abused mechanisms rather than a guarantee of good behaviour. On the date of the check, no admin minting function, transfer-pausing switch, or address blacklist was found in the implementation code, and a simulated sell completed successfully with 0% buy and sell tax. These are meaningful signals: they mean that, as the code currently stands, the contract owner has no obvious built-in way to mint unlimited new tokens, freeze your wallet, or block you from selling. However, two findings temper that picture considerably. The contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern, which means a single wallet holds the power to swap out the entire implementation code at any time — including reintroducing any of the mechanisms just listed, or adding new ones entirely. This effectively means today's clean findings describe the contract as it exists right now, not as it may exist tomorrow. Separately, the liquidity backing this token is not locked, so whoever controls that liquidity pool could withdraw it, which can sharply reduce the ability of holders to sell at a meaningful price even though the sell function itself works.
It's worth being clear about what this check does and doesn't cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code, not people. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens are distributed among holders, whether there are vesting schedules or insider allocations, what any whitepaper or roadmap claims, or whether there is a registered legal entity standing behind it. None of that has been assessed here, and no human has reviewed this contract or token — the findings above come entirely from automated analysis of the code and on-chain data as it existed on the check date.
Before putting money toward this or any token, consider looking at who holds the upgrade key and whether it's a multisig or a single wallet, checking the holder distribution to see how concentrated ownership is, looking at the liquidity pool directly to see its size and who controls it, searching for any public information about the team or audits, and treating marketing claims and social media activity with scepticism until you can verify them independently. Given that liquidity is unlocked and the code can be changed by one wallet at any time, these are areas worth scrutinising closely rather than taking the current clean mechanical findings as the full picture.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 12 points out of 100.
The other 88 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.