| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Into one pool address only | Doppler token code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 44.6% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 4918 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x1b37d3…80b69a |
| Current owner | 0xeb7c03…ad0862 — Doppler Airlock contract, owned by Doppler’s multisig |
| Holders | 4,918 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xdfe830…1b85eb | 24.02% |
| #2 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 6.87% |
| #3 | 0xabe0cd…5b98b1 | 2.91% |
| #4 | 0x1c4e90…2e7199 | 1.95% |
| #5 | 0x577236…44c044 | 1.84% |
This automated check scored SCHIFFY 15 out of 18 on contract mechanics, and it's worth unpacking what that actually permits. In a test transaction, the token could be bought and sold with no buy or sell tax detected, and no honeypot behaviour was found on the date of this check — meaning the simulation did not find a way the contract blocks a sale. No admin mint function was detected, so the owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute holders. There is no blacklist function present, so addresses cannot be individually blocked from trading. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot later be swapped for different code. One mechanism does carry real weight: the contract includes a feature (part of the Doppler Airlock launch framework) that lets the owner block transfers into a specific pool address. At launch this is pointed at the migration pool and does not affect normal trading, but Doppler's multisig retains the technical ability to redirect this block to the trading pool itself, which would stop sales. This is a live, if currently inactive, control point — it was not detected as active against trading on the date of this check, but the capability exists. Separately, the top 10 holders control 44.6% of supply, a concentration level that means large holders could move significant amounts and affect price. On the positive side, liquidity in the launch pool is locked permanently, and the contract source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is at least visible for review.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It reads contract mechanics only — it says nothing about who the team is, whether they have a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested among insiders, whether marketing claims match reality, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind the project. A contract can score well on mechanics while the people behind it still behave in ways that harm holders, and conversely, flagged mechanics don't by themselves mean harmful intent. No human has reviewed this token; the result above comes entirely from automated analysis of the code and a point-in-time simulation.
Before putting money in, consider looking at who controls the Doppler multisig and whether that control is itself timelocked, renounced, or held by a known, accountable entity. Check whether the top-10 holder addresses include known team, treasury, or exchange wallets, since that changes what concentration means in practice. Look at the token's trading history and liquidity depth over time, not just at a single snapshot. Read any available documentation on vesting schedules and token distribution plans. And treat this score as a description of code behaviour on one date, not a judgement on the people or plans behind the project.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.