| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Into one pool address only | Doppler token code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 96.4% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 37 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x1b37d3…80b69a |
| Current owner | 0xeb7c03…ad0862 — Doppler Airlock contract, owned by Doppler’s multisig |
| Holders | 37 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 88.60% |
| #2 | 0x1e48c2…eb2aab | 2.20% |
| #3 | 0x184599…7cfd71 | 0.91% |
| #4 | 0x6078ee…b358b2 | 0.88% |
| #5 | 0xa0ed47…a0ff85 | 0.76% |
This automated check scored MCRIB 11 out of 18 on contract mechanics read on the date of the check. A test transfer simulation found the token sellable, with 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected, and no honeypot behaviour was found at this time. No admin mint function was present, so the contract owner cannot be observed to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders that way. No address blacklist function was detected, and the contract is not upgradeable, meaning its core logic cannot be swapped out after the fact. One mechanism does concentrate some control with the owner: the transfer-pause function tied to Doppler's Airlock can block transfers into a given pool address. At launch this is pointed at the migration pool, which does not interfere with ordinary trading, but Doppler's multisig holds the ability to redirect this pause to the trading pool instead, which would stop sales for all holders until reversed. This is a capability that exists in the code, not a prediction that it will be used. Liquidity in the launch pool is recorded as locked permanently, and the contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the published code can be read and matched against what is deployed.
Two figures stand out as risk indicators on the holder side: only 37 holders are recorded, and the top 10 addresses between them control 96.4% of supply. High concentration like this means a small number of wallets could sell in a way that moves the price sharply, regardless of what the contract code permits or restricts.
None of this tells you who the team behind MCRIB is, whether they have a track record, how the token's supply and incentives are structured beyond raw concentration, what any whitepaper or roadmap claims, or whether any entity involved has legal or regulatory obligations attached to this launch. Contract mechanics and intent are two separate things, and this check only covers the former.
Before putting money in, it would be worth independently verifying who controls the Doppler multisig and under what conditions it could redirect the transfer-pause, looking at where the top-10 holder wallets came from and whether they are linked to the project team or exchanges, checking whether the project has any public team identity or audit beyond automated contract scanning, and reviewing the terms under which the locked liquidity was locked, including its duration and who holds the lock itself.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.