| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 39.9% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 7100 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x85174a…bf15ae |
| Code can be replaced by | 0xd7be2c…52e608 — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x997732…a82aaf |
| Holders | 7,100 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xd7be2c…52e608 | 28.48% |
| #2 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 7.84% |
| #3 | 0xd1915e…574cc4 | 0.52% |
| #4 | 0x4335e3…d5547f | 0.51% |
| #5 | 0x2ceb11…c6e68f | 0.47% |
This automated check found that GTA6 (GTA VI) can currently be bought and sold, with no buy or sell tax detected and no honeypot behaviour identified in simulation on the date of the check. However, several contract mechanics give the owner significant control over how the token behaves. Blacklisting is enabled, meaning the contract owner has the ability to block specific wallet addresses from transacting, effectively freezing those holdings. More significantly, this contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern, which means a single wallet can replace the underlying contract code entirely — including the very mechanics this check just assessed. In practical terms, an upgrade could introduce new taxes, pausing, minting, or transfer restrictions at any point in the future, even if none of those exist today. Liquidity is also not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool can withdraw it, potentially leaving holders unable to sell at a meaningful price even though no sell block was detected. Holder concentration sits at 39.9% among the top ten wallets, which is a moderate concentration worth factoring in when thinking about how sell pressure from a small number of addresses could affect the market.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not evaluate who is behind the project, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there is a legitimate roadmap or business behind the name, or whether any license, trademark, or legal relationship to "GTA VI" actually exists. A verified source and a clean simulation tell you about mechanics, not about intent, and intent cannot be assessed from bytecode.
Given the upgradeable proxy and unlocked liquidity, it would be reasonable to look into who holds the upgrade/admin key and whether it sits behind a multisig or timelock, since that materially affects how quickly contract behaviour could change. It's also worth checking where the liquidity pool tokens are held and by whom, looking at the distribution and history of the top holder wallets, and searching independently for any team identity, communications, or official statements tied to this specific contract address — keeping in mind that a name matching a well-known franchise does not by itself confirm any connection to it.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.