| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 53.7% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 5935 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb6d226…5c86c0 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x74a4cc…366c8d — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x8363a6…9282a8 |
| Holders | 5,935 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x8366a3…e40951 | 26.87% |
| #2 | 0x74a4cc…366c8d | 24.52% |
| #3 | 0x91f5e8…010196 | 0.56% |
| #4 · contract | 0x551e47…ece4ed | 0.50% |
| #5 · contract | 0xc07f97…d48445 | 0.34% |
This automated check scanned the GTA6 (GTA VI) contract on the robinhood chain and found a few mechanics worth understanding before deciding anything. The contract includes a blacklist function, which means the address holding admin rights can block specific wallets from transferring or selling the token at any time. More significantly, the contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern — this means a single wallet has the power to swap out the underlying contract code entirely, which could introduce new restrictions, fees, or behaviours not present today, including ones that override the current "no honeypot behaviour detected" and "0% tax" results. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, which would affect the ability to sell at a reasonable price even though the sell function itself works as of this check. On the positive side, the contract source is verified on the block explorer, no admin mint function was found in the implementation code, and transfers were not found to be pausable. Holder concentration is relatively high, with the top 10 wallets controlling 53.7% of supply across 5,935 total holders, which is a factor worth weighing independently of the contract mechanics above.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it does not evaluate the team behind the project, their track record, the token's economic design, marketing claims, legal structure, or intent. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be part of a project with weak fundamentals or undisclosed risks, and conversely, flagged mechanics don't necessarily mean harmful intent. No human has reviewed this project, and nothing here should be read as a judgement on whether the people behind GTA6 (GTA VI) are acting in good faith.
Before putting any money in, it would be worth looking into who controls the admin and proxy-upgrade wallets, whether that control sits with a multisig or a single key, and whether there's any public information about a timelock on upgrades. Checking the liquidity pool directly — who owns the LP tokens and whether there's any lock or vesting schedule — would also fill a gap this check can't close. Researching the team's public identity, prior projects, and community discussion, and reading any available audit reports in full rather than relying on a summary, are reasonable next steps. None of this is investment advice, and this check does not predict how the token will perform.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.