| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 72.3% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 2825 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xda2af2…b5db74 |
| Holders | 2,825 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe90644…97112b | 21.75% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 13.62% |
| #3 · contract | 0xf77859…9cad98 | 10.50% |
| #4 · contract | 0x907451…5e2286 | 9.33% |
| #5 | 0x28c6c0…f21d60 | 4.07% |
This automated check scanned the PROM contract on Ethereum and found a score of 13 out of 18. In practical terms, the simulation found the token can be sold, and buy and sell taxes are both set at 0%, meaning no transfer fee was detected at the time of the check. No admin mint function was found, so there is no on-chain mechanism detected that would let the owner create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function was found, meaning no code was detected that would let an owner freeze everyone's transfers at will. No blacklist function was found, so no mechanism was detected for blocking specific addresses from trading. The contract is also not upgradeable, which means its code cannot be swapped out for different logic later. Two things stand out as risk indicators, though: liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, reducing the ability of holders to sell at a stable price; and the top 10 holders control 72.3% of supply, a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could move the market significantly if they sold.
It is worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — things like mint functions, pause switches, blacklists, tax settings, and liquidity lock status. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of delivering, how the token's economics are structured long-term, whether there are legal or regulatory exposures, or what the team's intentions are. A clean mechanical read and a well-intentioned project are two different things, and this check only speaks to the first.
Before putting money into PROM, it would be worth looking into who holds that 72.3% and whether any of those wallets are known exchange or team addresses, since that changes the picture considerably. It's also worth checking the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who controls it and whether there's any stated lock or vesting plan, even if it isn't enforced by a locking contract. Looking at the project's own communications, audit history (if any), and team transparency would fill in the parts this check cannot see. None of this replaces independent research, and nothing here should be read as a signal to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.