| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a 1-of-2 multisig can replace the code | Proxy contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 40.2% | Holder distribution | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 221894 | Token contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x45f999…125b52 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x369e6f…699111 — a 1-of-2 multisig |
| Current code | 0x2c4a81…972e50 |
| Holders | 221,894 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x22ec52…119d40 | 11.95% |
| #2 · contract | 0x34bcf8…67a026 | 6.45% |
| #3 · contract | 0xec53bf…061f83 | 5.31% |
| #4 | 0xf97781…41acec | 3.70% |
| #5 | 0x5a52e9…70efcb | 3.42% |
This automated check looked at how the EIGEN contract is built and how it behaved in a simulated transaction, not at who runs the project or what it intends to do with your money. On the findings: the contract is an upgradeable proxy controlled by a 1-of-2 multisig, which means that a small group holding just one of two keys can replace the underlying contract code at any time — in principle this would let them change how the token behaves, including introducing mechanics like transfer pauses, blacklists or minting that are not present today. No admin mint function, transfer-pause function or address blacklist was found in the current implementation code, and the simulation did not detect honeypot-style behaviour — the token could be bought and sold with 0% tax on each side at the time of the check. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying logic to be publicly read and audited, by ChainSift or anyone else. Holder concentration is moderate-to-high, with the top ten wallets holding 40.2% of supply, and liquidity in the pool checked was not found to be locked, meaning liquidity providers could withdraw it without a time-lock preventing them from doing so.
It's worth being clear about what this does not cover. This is a read of contract mechanics only: it says nothing about the team behind EIGEN, their track record, the token's broader economic design (vesting schedules, emission plans, treasury control), any legal or regulatory status, or their intent. A contract can score well on mechanics and still carry risk from how it's managed, marketed or funded off-chain. No person reviewed this listing — every line above came from automated analysis of the contract and a point-in-time snapshot of holder and liquidity data, so conditions can change after the check was run.
Before putting money in, it would be worth independently verifying who controls the 1-of-2 multisig and what governance process, if any, surrounds upgrades — this information is often published by the project itself or discoverable via the explorer. It's also worth checking the current liquidity lock status directly on the relevant DEX or lock-service page, since this can change over time, reviewing the top-holder wallets to see whether they're exchange or protocol addresses versus individual holders, and looking for independent audits, incident history and official project communications. None of the above should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.