| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 4 | Token contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 16 Feb 2025 — 567 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x9ae63e…27ce88 |
| Deployed by | 0xaf2587…aaa16f |
| Current owner | 0xaf2587…aaa16f |
| Holders | 4 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xaf2587…aaa16f | 99.86% |
| #2 | 0x2ddb98…e75fcc | 0.13% |
| #3 | 0xf5b9f6…a9ebc4 | 0.01% |
| #4 | 0x7a56f6…d4cd5f | 0.00% |
This automated check scanned the MPRA contract on Ethereum and scored it 10 out of 18 on the mechanics it looked for. Three findings stand out. First, the contract owner retains the ability to mint new tokens at will, which means the total supply is not fixed and can be increased at any time, potentially diluting the value of tokens already held. Second, the top 10 wallets hold 100% of the entire supply, and the contract shows only 4 holders in total — this is an extremely high concentration, meaning a very small number of addresses could move a large portion of supply in a single transaction, which can affect the ability to sell at an expected price. Third, the contract source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the actual code is publicly readable rather than hidden, which allowed this check to inspect its functions directly. On the more reassuring side, no buy or sell tax was detected, transfers were not found to be pausable, no blacklist function was detected, and a transfer simulation indicated the token can currently be sold — none of which are the same as a guarantee that these conditions will hold in future, only that they were not detected on the date of this check.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated review of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not evaluate who is behind the project, whether any team members are publicly identified or credible, how the tokenomics are structured beyond what's on-chain, whether any legal entity stands behind the token, or what the stated purpose and roadmap are. A verified, mintable, concentrated-supply contract can exist under many different circumstances, and this check has no way to assess intent — only mechanics.
Given the mint function and the extreme concentration among just four holders, it would be reasonable to look further before forming a view. That could include checking whether the project has any public documentation explaining why minting is enabled and under what conditions it would be used, looking at the transaction history of the top holder addresses to see whether they are exchange or liquidity contracts rather than individual wallets, checking whether liquidity is locked and for how long, and searching independently for any public information about the team or entity issuing the token. None of these steps are covered by this automated check, and none of the findings above should be read as advice to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.