| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 74.9% | Holder distribution | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 85116 | Token contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 29 Sept 2024 — 713 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x707e07…35f4cc |
| Deployed by | 0x97f1f8…f921e3 |
| Holders | 85,116 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5be9a4…957dbb | 40.44% |
| #2 | 0x1246e4…3830ad | 15.75% |
| #3 | 0xee7f7f…a174dc | 3.75% |
| #4 | 0xf32e35…134748 | 3.19% |
| #5 | 0x5ab261…5fda74 | 3.00% |
This automated check found that WLFI is built as an upgradeable proxy contract, which means the wallet or entity controlling it can swap out the underlying logic that governs how the token behaves, at a later date, without the token's address changing. In practice, this gives the contract owner the ability to alter the rules a holder is subject to after the fact — including, potentially, introducing mechanics that were not present at the time of purchase. Separately, the top 10 holder addresses control 74.9% of the circulating supply as of the date of this check, meaning a small number of wallets could move a large share of tokens at once, which can affect available liquidity and price stability. No admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, and no address blacklist function were detected in the contract at the time of the check, and a transfer simulation indicated the token was sellable. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code shown publicly matches what is deployed, which allows this kind of automated review to take place at all. Buy and sell tax data were not available from this check.
It is worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at what the code allows the owner to do, not at who the owner is, what they intend to do, or whether they will do it. It does not assess the project's team, their track record, the token's economic design, how supply is scheduled to unlock, any legal or regulatory structure behind the project, or marketing claims made about it. A clean read on contract mechanics does not mean the people behind a token are trustworthy, and flags like an upgradeable proxy do not mean misuse is planned — only that the technical ability exists.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth looking into who controls the upgrade keys and whether that control sits with a multisig or a single wallet, checking whether there's a timelock on upgrades, and looking at how the top holders are labelled — for example, whether large balances belong to exchanges, treasury or team wallets, or vesting contracts rather than independent buyers. It's also worth reviewing any published documentation on tokenomics and vesting schedules, checking whether the project has had independent audits and reading what they found, and searching for independent commentary on the team and their history. None of this replaces your own judgement, and this check does not constitute financial advice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.