| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 73% | Holder distribution | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 12503 | Token contract | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x0ccf14…0df21e |
| Holders | 12,503 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x3bdc69…b469d6 | 47.76% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 5.25% |
| #3 | 0x57757e…647806 | 5.08% |
| #4 | 0x07a989…51daaa | 3.07% |
| #5 · contract | 0xd33526…21a51f | 3.06% |
This automated check on RPL (Rocket Pool Protocol, Ethereum) returned a score of 11 out of 18 based on findings present in the contract code as of the check date. Transfer simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both at 0%, and no pause or blacklist functions were detected, meaning the contract does not currently contain code that would let an owner freeze transfers or block specific wallets from selling. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying code to be read and cross-checked. However, admin mint is enabled, meaning whoever controls the owner address retains the ability to create new tokens at will; this can dilute existing holders' share of supply without their consent. Top-10 wallets hold 73.1% of supply, a concentration level where coordinated or individual large sales could move the price significantly regardless of what the contract code permits. Liquidity is not locked, which means whoever supplied the trading pool tokens could withdraw them, reducing or removing the ability to trade the token on that pool.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanical functions — mint permissions, tax settings, pause and blacklist capability, proxy structure, and holder distribution as recorded on-chain. It says nothing about the team behind the token, their identity, track record or intentions, nor does it assess the project's tokenomics design, roadmap, legal structure, licensing status, or whether marketing claims match reality. No flag being present does not mean a risk doesn't exist elsewhere; it means that specific behaviour was not detected in the contract on the date this check ran. Ownership and permissions can also change after the check is run.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth looking at who controls the owner address and whether it is a multisig or a single key, checking whether mint or ownership functions have been renounced or time-locked, reviewing the liquidity pool directly to see who holds the LP tokens and under what terms, and looking at the project's own documentation and any independent audits for context on the mint function's intended use. Reviewing recent on-chain transaction history for large holder movements and checking community and developer activity over time may also help build a fuller picture. None of this constitutes financial advice, and the findings here should be treated as one input among several, not a final determination of outcome.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.