| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — accounts holding an admin role can replace the code | Proxy contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 43.5% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 219049 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xdae424…4c9f26 |
| Code can be replaced by | Accounts holding an admin role |
| Current code | 0x8d92a6…c5a5f9 |
| Holders | 219,049 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf97781…41acec | 11.74% |
| #2 | 0x5a52e9…70efcb | 10.35% |
| #3 | 0x76ec5a…78fbd3 | 5.50% |
| #4 · contract | 0x326d9f…70a601 | 2.89% |
| #5 | 0x77fb35…94df0e | 2.68% |
This automated check on GALA found an on-chain score of 11 out of 18, with no honeypot behaviour detected: a simulated sell went through, and buy and sell tax both read 0% at the time of the check. A number of findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract allows the owner to mint new tokens, which means the circulating supply can be increased at the owner's discretion, potentially diluting existing holders. Transfers can be paused by the owner, meaning holders could be temporarily (or indefinitely) prevented from moving or selling their tokens. The contract supports blacklisting specific addresses, which would let the owner block particular wallets from transacting. It is also an upgradeable proxy, which is significant: an account holding admin rights can replace the underlying contract code entirely, meaning any of the mechanics described here — or new ones — could change in future without holders having direct control over that decision. Separately, the top 10 holders control 43.5% of supply, a concentration level that means large holders moving tokens could affect available liquidity or price conditions. Liquidity is not locked, though this is common for large, established tokens and the main pool here shows 10 separate liquidity providers rather than a single party. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the code is publicly readable and was available for this automated review.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not do. This is a mechanical, automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it does not evaluate the team behind the project, the token's economic design, legal structure, roadmap, or intent. A contract can score well on these technical checks while other risks entirely outside this scope remain unassessed, and conversely, having owner powers like minting or pausing does not by itself indicate those powers will be used against holders.
Before putting money in, consider looking into who controls the admin and upgrade keys (a multisig with known, reputable signers is generally considered a different risk profile than a single wallet), whether there's a timelock on upgrades or admin actions, the project's own documentation on why these owner powers exist, recent on-chain activity from the top holders, and independent commentary or audits from sources outside this report.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.