Before you buy: How much real money is in the pool, what do you lose selling $1,000, and who can pull it out?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% burned | LP holders | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 118 | Token contract | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x568eba…611c85 |
| Holders | 118 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x568eba…611c85 | 100.00% |
| #2 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x000000…e08a90 | 7.56% |
| #3 | 0x41759e…d4f4aa | 2.51% |
| #4 | 0xdfc89e…9cb57e | 2.47% |
| #5 | 0x2c095c…236891 | 2.43% |
This automated check returned a score of 12 out of 12 for Rocco on Ethereum, which means none of the contract mechanics it looks for were detected as present at the time of the scan. In practical terms: a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and both the buy and sell tax are set to 0%, so nothing in the contract code currently taxes or blocks trades. No admin mint function was found, meaning the owner has no built-in way to create new tokens and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable and there is no blacklist function, so the owner cannot currently freeze the contract or lock out specific wallets. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, which means its code cannot be swapped out for different logic later without deploying an entirely new contract. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so the logic described above is publicly readable rather than hidden. Liquidity is reported as 100% burned, meaning the tokens that back the trading pool have been sent to an address no one controls, which reduces (though does not eliminate) the risk of the pool being drained in one go.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It only reads contract mechanics as they exist on-chain today — it says nothing about who the team behind Rocco is, whether they have a track record, how the token's supply is distributed among wallets beyond the raw holder count, what the stated purpose or roadmap is, or whether any off-chain promises are credible. A contract with no detected red flags can still be part of a project with weak fundamentals, an inexperienced or anonymous team, or a token design that concentrates value in ways this scan doesn't capture. With only 118 holders recorded, the token is held by a small number of wallets, and this check does not tell you how that supply is split between them.
Before putting money into Rocco, it would be worth looking at a block explorer's holder list to see what percentage the top wallets control, checking whether the liquidity lock or burn transaction is verifiable on-chain yourself, researching the team's identity and public history, and reviewing any official communications or documentation for the project independently. None of this constitutes investment advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell the token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 12 points out of 100.
The other 88 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.