| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 76.3% | Holder distribution | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 9913 | Token contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x123694…d14caf |
| Current owner | 0x87f005…75f45f |
| Holders | 9,913 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x9f0170…dbd4ef | 30.78% |
| #2 · contract | 0xeaf047…53574c | 10.72% |
| #3 | 0x593c42…f15bb5 | 9.49% |
| #4 · contract | 0x1cca7e…47680e | 5.64% |
| #5 | 0x1b6f86…7b1896 | 4.81% |
This automated check scanned the contract code for T (Threshold Network Token) on Ethereum and scored it 11 out of 18 on the mechanics it looks for. A few things stand out. The contract includes an active mint function, which means whoever holds the admin keys can create new tokens at will, increasing total supply and potentially diluting the value of existing holdings. No pause function or address blacklist was detected on the date of this check, meaning the contract does not currently appear to give the owner the ability to freeze transfers or block specific wallets from trading. Buy and sell simulations returned no tax and no honeypot behaviour, meaning the check was able to buy and sell the token without being blocked or charged a fee, as of the test. Holder concentration is high: the top 10 wallets hold 76.2% of the circulating supply, which means a small number of addresses could move a large portion of supply and affect the market if they chose to sell. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, which would reduce or remove the ability to trade the token on that pool. The contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the published code can be read and checked against what is actually deployed, but verification alone does not say anything about what that code does.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not evaluate the team behind the project, how tokens are allocated or vested, any legal structure, marketing claims, or intent. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be tied to a project with weak fundamentals, and conversely, flags like mint capability or unlocked liquidity do not by themselves mean the project is being run with bad intent; many established tokens retain these functions for legitimate operational reasons. No human has reviewed this token or made a judgement about it — these are automated findings based on code and on-chain data at a point in time.
Before putting any money in, it's worth looking into who controls the admin and mint functions and whether those permissions sit behind a multisig or timelock, checking the project's own documentation for why liquidity isn't locked and what the mint function is used for, reviewing the distribution and vesting schedule of the top holders, and looking at the project's history, audits (if any), and community activity independently. None of this replaces your own research, and nothing here should be read as advice to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.