| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 68.7% | Holder distribution | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 35593 | Token contract | 23 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf28f34…7d8130 |
| Holders | 35,593 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xce5485…afc7a4 | 38.95% |
| #2 | 0x1521f0…dfd68c | 9.85% |
| #3 | 0x10e575…abbf0f | 9.34% |
| #4 | 0xf97781…41acec | 2.62% |
| #5 | 0x798425…c2dab0 | 2.03% |
This automated check scored STRK 12 out of 18 on contract mechanics. Here is what that translates to in practice. The contract includes an admin mint function, which means whoever controls that permission can create new tokens at will, increasing total supply and potentially diluting the value of tokens already held by others. Buying and selling both simulate successfully with no tax detected on either side, and no pause or blacklist functions were found in the contract, meaning the code as read does not currently give the owner a way to freeze transfers or block specific wallets from moving funds. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying code to be read and checked by anyone, rather than remaining opaque. Top-10 wallets hold 68.7% of supply, a level of concentration that means a small number of holders could move a large share of tokens at once, which can affect available liquidity and price if they choose to sell. Liquidity was not found to be locked at the time of this check, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — no person has reviewed the project, and nothing here speaks to who the team behind StarkNet is, whether they have a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, what legal entity if any stands behind the project, or what their stated intentions are. A contract can score well on mechanics and still carry risks tied to how it is run, who holds admin keys, or what happens outside the blockchain entirely. None of that is assessed here.
Before putting any money in, it's worth checking who currently holds the admin/owner keys for the mint function, and whether that control sits with a multisig, a foundation, or a single wallet. Look into whether liquidity being unlocked is explained anywhere officially, and by whom the pool is currently controlled. Review the top-10 holder addresses directly on the explorer to see whether they are exchanges, foundation wallets, or unidentified private addresses, since that changes the interpretation of concentration significantly. Independently verify the token's official contract address against the project's own published sources, read any available audit reports, and check StarkNet's own documentation on supply and mint policy before forming a view.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.