| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Proxy contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 97.7% | Holder distribution | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 119 | Token contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf37c67…d58741 |
| Current code | 0x97b0fb…6a50bb |
| Holders | 119 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5d0a03…ee350c | 79.92% |
| #2 | 0xb5d879…7123f0 | 4.68% |
| #3 | 0x8894e0…e2d4e3 | 3.00% |
| #4 | 0xff23f8…bb2f25 | 2.35% |
| #5 | 0xf37c67…d58741 | 2.31% |
This automated check gave OPNRS 11 out of 18, which reflects a mix of lower-risk and higher-risk signals rather than a single verdict. In practical terms: the contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning anyone can read the actual logic rather than trusting a black box, and that's a positive signal. No admin minting function, transfer pause switch, or address blacklist was found in the implementation code as of this check, meaning the owner does not currently appear able to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze trading, or block specific wallets from moving their holdings. A simulated sale went through with 0% buy and sell tax, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of testing. However, the contract uses an upgradeable proxy structure, which means the underlying logic can be swapped out by whoever controls the upgrade function — in effect, the rules you're reading today are not necessarily the rules that apply tomorrow, since a future upgrade could introduce minting, pausing, blacklisting, or other restrictions that aren't present now. Separately, the top 10 holders control 97.7% of the circulating supply, which is a significant concentration; large holders moving tokens, whether through selling or transfers, can affect the token's liquidity and trading conditions for everyone else.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code, tax behaviour in simulation, and on-chain holder data. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team is doxxed or anonymous, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, what the stated use case is, or whether any marketing claims hold up. Intent, business viability, and legal standing are entirely outside the scope of this tool.
Before putting any money in, it's worth looking into who controls the proxy's upgrade function and whether that control sits behind a multisig, a timelock, or a single private key — this materially changes how much trust is placed in one party. It's also worth researching the team's public identity and track record, reading whatever documentation or whitepaper exists for the token's intended use, checking whether liquidity is locked and for how long, and looking at exchange or community discussion for independent commentary. Given the holder concentration, tracking whether large wallets are moving funds is also a reasonable ongoing check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.