| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 45.7% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 220590 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x1449e0…6d9adb |
| Holders | 220,590 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x91d147…de3292 | 17.50% |
| #2 | 0x1d4896…030270 | 12.78% |
| #3 | 0xf97781…41acec | 4.58% |
| #4 | 0x27944b…2f7c80 | 2.87% |
| #5 · contract | 0x8baccc…406567 | 1.92% |
This automated check looked at the COMP contract's code and on-chain data as of today and did not detect the mechanics that typically allow an owner to trap or drain holders. A test transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and both the buy and sell tax are set to 0%, meaning no fee was detected being siphoned off on trades. No admin minting function was found, so there's no detected mechanism for the contract owner to create new tokens and dilute supply at will. No pause function was detected, meaning no on-chain way was found for someone to freeze transfers and stop holders from moving or selling their tokens. No blacklist function was detected either, so no built-in mechanism was found to block specific wallets from trading. The contract is also not upgradeable via proxy, which means its core logic cannot be swapped out later by whoever controls it. Two points stand out: the top 10 wallets hold 46.1% of supply, a concentration level where large holders could move the market if they sell, and the liquidity behind this token is not locked, meaning whoever controls that liquidity pool retains the technical ability to withdraw it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated scan of contract code and on-chain data only — nothing here was reviewed by a person, and nothing here evaluates the team behind the project, how tokens are allocated or scheduled to unlock, the legal structure of the entity involved, or the intent of anyone holding admin keys or large balances. A contract can score well on mechanics like this one and still carry risk from factors entirely outside the code, such as a team quietly holding a large share of supply, misleading marketing, or off-chain promises that aren't enforced on-chain.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking into who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses rather than independent holders, since that changes what 46.1% concentration actually means. Check where the liquidity sits, who controls that pool, and whether a lock is planned or simply absent. Look for a public team, audit reports from named firms, and a token allocation or vesting schedule. Cross-reference the contract address independently against the project's official website and social channels to confirm you're looking at the right token entirely, since contract checks like this one can't verify that a given address is genuinely tied to the project it claims to represent.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.