| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 87% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 78780 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf5997b…f69895 |
| Holders | 78,780 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xf33341…50440a | 33.57% |
| #2 · contract | 0x73b171…9a1162 | 32.85% |
| #3 | 0x24b0a4…3b77e5 | 11.29% |
| #4 · contract | 0xd631db…5bd641 | 2.62% |
| #5 | 0xf97781…41acec | 1.89% |
This automated check looked at the AXS contract's code and on-chain data as it stands today, and scored it 13 out of 18. In practical terms, the findings suggest the contract does not currently give its owner some of the more invasive controls seen in riskier tokens: there is no admin mint function that would let new tokens be created and dilute holders, no ability to pause transfers and trap holders out of trading, and no blacklist function that could block specific wallets from selling. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot be silently swapped out for different code later. Buy and sell taxes are both 0%, and a transfer simulation indicates the token can be sold, which together point away from the "honeypot" pattern where buyers can purchase but not later sell. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so its contents are publicly readable rather than hidden. The main caution flagged is that the top 10 holders control 87.1% of supply, a concentration level that means large holders could in principle move significant amounts of the token and affect its price; and liquidity in the main pool is spread across 26 providers rather than locked, which is typical for a token of this size but still means that liquidity is not contractually guaranteed to stay in place.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — things that can be verified from code and on-chain data. It says nothing about who runs Axie Infinity Shard, how the token's broader economy or emissions schedule works, what legal entity or jurisdiction stands behind the project, or whether the team's stated intentions match their actions. A clean mechanical scan does not speak to governance quality, business viability, or the people involved.
Before putting money in, it's worth independently looking into the project's team and track record, reading the tokenomics and supply schedule to understand future dilution or unlock events, checking whether there is legal or regulatory information disclosed by the project, and looking at where the token trades and how deep that liquidity actually is on the exchanges you'd use. Findings here reflect conditions observed at the time of the check and can change as contracts, holders, or liquidity shift, so it's sensible to treat this as one input among several rather than a final verdict.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.