| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 57.7% | Holder distribution | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 338370 | Token contract | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x00c5e0…ec8454 |
| Current owner | 0x00c5e0…ec8454 |
| Holders | 338,370 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf97781…41acec | 23.01% |
| #2 | 0x480234…d77e5f | 7.80% |
| #3 | 0xa73d90…19a1fc | 7.49% |
| #4 · contract | 0xb8c774…1bdd52 | 5.99% |
| #5 | 0xf60c2e…30019c | 4.87% |
This automated check on BNB (ethereum) scored 14 out of 18, and it is worth walking through what that actually covers. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both at 0% at the time of the check. No admin mint function was detected, meaning nothing was found in the contract that would let the owner create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers were not found to be pausable, so no mechanism was detected that would let an owner freeze trading for everyone. No address blacklist function was detected, which would otherwise allow specific wallets to be blocked from selling. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out later by whoever controls it, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, so the deployed logic can be read by anyone. Two points stand out: the top 10 holders control 57.7% of supply, a concentration level where large wallets moving at once could affect price significantly, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it.
It is important to be clear about what this score does not tell you. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics as they exist on-chain today — it detects specific technical behaviours like mint functions, pausability, blacklists and tax rates. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of delivering, how tokens were allocated at launch, whether there are vesting schedules for insiders, what the token is meant to be used for, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind it. No human has reviewed this token, and a clean mechanical read is not an endorsement of intent, competence, or future conduct by whoever holds admin rights or large balances.
Before putting money in, it is worth checking the LP lock status directly on a tool that tracks liquidity pool tokens, since "not locked" here means the liquidity provider retains the technical ability to remove funds from the pool at will, regardless of whether they plan to. Look at where the top 10 holder wallets sit — are they exchange or bridge addresses, or unlabelled wallets that could sell in coordination. Search for the team, audits, and any public communication about token allocation and unlock schedules. Cross-reference the contract address against the project's official channels to confirm you are looking at the token you think you are, since naming alone (such as "BNB" on a chain other than BNB's native chain) can be a red flag worth investigating on its own.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.