| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 50.2% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.8% burned | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 20051 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x5e58c9…0ebaf4 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 20,051 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV2 · contract | 0xaf06e7…4164e9 | 19.29% |
| #2 · contract | 0x6a6448…bc4442 | 14.23% |
| #3 | 0x9d06c3…bfcd48 | 3.45% |
| #4 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 2.87% |
| #5 | 0xd607a6…31238f | 2.21% |
This automated check found no honeypot behaviour at the time of testing: a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and buy and sell taxes were both recorded at 0%. The contract also showed no admin mint function, no ability to pause transfers, and no blacklist function present at the time of the check, meaning the code does not currently show a way for the contract owner to block a specific wallet from trading, mint new tokens into their own balance, or freeze the token entirely. The contract is not upgradeable, so the rules that were read during this check cannot later be swapped for different ones through a proxy. Liquidity sits at 99.8% burned, which means the vast majority of the trading pool backing this token on the decentralised exchange is not sitting in a wallet that could withdraw it. One point worth noting: the top 10 holders control 50.2% of supply, which is a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could sell in a way that moves the price significantly, though this on its own is not evidence of intent.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is a mechanical read of the smart contract code and on-chain data only — it checks what the contract *can* do, not what the people behind it *will* do or *why* they built it. It does not assess the team's identity or track record, the project's tokenomics or long-term incentive design, whether there is a company or legal entity behind it, marketing claims, or any off-chain promises made on social media or in a whitepaper. A clean contract read says nothing about whether the stated use case is real, whether the roadmap will be delivered, or whether the people involved have done this before under a different name. This check is fully automated; no person has reviewed this token or formed a judgement about it.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth looking into who is behind the project and whether they're identifiable, checking whether the liquidity lock is verifiable through a third-party locker service rather than just the burn address shown here, reviewing how the top holders came to hold their positions (early allocation versus open-market purchase), and reading the contract's full source code or a human audit if one exists. Checking community activity, trading volume history, and whether the project has any independent coverage can also help build a fuller picture. None of the findings above should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.