| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 96.9% | Holder distribution | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% until 24 Sept 2036 | LP holders · UNCX Locker | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 131 | Token contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe38087…bedcd5 |
| Holders | 131 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x000000…e08a90 | 82.89% |
| #2 · contract | 0x442c53…289e6f | 8.81% |
| #3 · contract | 0x8569fc…74cf39 | 1.10% |
| #4 | 0x20438c…aee79d | 1.02% |
| #5 | 0x5efd88…cd6841 | 0.74% |
This automated check looked at the BIC contract on Ethereum and scored it 12 out of 18 on mechanics that can be read directly from the code and chain data. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, meaning the contract does not appear to block holders from offloading tokens, and no honeypot-style restriction was detected on the date of this check. No admin mint function, no pause function, and no address blacklist capability were detected, which means that, as far as the contract code shows, the owner does not currently hold a coded ability to create new tokens at will, freeze transfers, or lock specific wallets out of trading. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, so its logic cannot be swapped out after deployment the way some tokens are rebuilt mid-flight. Liquidity is reported as 100% locked until September 2036, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the likelihood of a straightforward liquidity-pull rug, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the actual logic is publicly readable rather than hidden. Buy and sell tax data could not be retrieved, so no statement can be made either way about transaction fees on trades. Set against this, the top 10 wallets hold 96.9% of the supply across only 131 holders total — a very high concentration that means a small number of addresses could move a large share of the circulating supply at once, which can affect price and liquidity regardless of what the contract code permits or forbids.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — what the code technically allows or blocks. It says nothing about who the team behind BIC is, whether they are identifiable or anonymous, how tokens were distributed or vested, what the project's stated purpose or roadmap is, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what the team's intentions are. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be attached to a project with weak fundamentals, concentrated insider control, or no real activity behind it.
Before putting money in, it would be reasonable to look at who the top holders actually are and whether any are known exchange, team, or lock-contract addresses rather than independent buyers; to check the liquidity lock contract directly on-chain to confirm the terms match what's reported; to look for an active, verifiable team or entity behind the project; and to search for independent commentary or audits beyond this automated contract-level read. None of the findings above should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.