SHIRO On-Chain Risk Check

Shiro Neko · Ethereum · 0xb0ac2b5a73da0e67a8e5489ba922b3f8d582e058
14 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 26 Oct 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 26 Oct 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 26 Oct 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 26 Oct 2026
Admin mint Not present Contract 26 Oct 2026
Transfers pausable Not present Contract 26 Oct 2026
Address blacklist Owner renounced — no one can blacklist ChainSift simulation 26 Oct 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 26 Oct 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 26 Oct 2026
Top-10 holders 54.7% Holder distribution 26 Oct 2026
Liquidity locked 99.9% burned LP holders 26 Oct 2026
Holders 21450 Token contract 26 Oct 2026

This contract — SHIRO

Deployed by0x786f94…dbe71e
Current ownerNone — ownership renounced
Holders21,450

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · Dead · burned 0xdead00…942069 23.22%
#2 · UniswapV2 · contract 0xd293d0…f05b1f 10.42%
#3 0x0d0707…b492fe 5.46%
#4 0x9fa104…c0d5b5 2.89%
#5 · contract 0x3e1202…e4441b 2.76%

What this means

This automated check of SHIRO (Shiro Neko) on Ethereum scored 14 out of 18, and on the date of the check the picture is largely favourable from a mechanics standpoint. The contract does contain functions that would, in principle, let an owner blacklist addresses, control automated market maker pairs, adjust cooldowns and limits, or pull stuck tokens from the contract — these are the kinds of powers that, if active, could let someone stop specific wallets from selling or reshape trading rules after launch. However, ownership of this contract has been renounced, meaning the wallet that would need to call those functions no longer has admin rights, and the simulation found no live ability for anyone to blacklist addresses. Buy and sell tax are both reported at 0%, no admin mint function was found, transfers cannot be paused, and the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so there is no detected mechanism for the code itself to change after the fact. A sell simulation confirmed the token is sellable, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected on this check. Liquidity is reported as 99.9% burned, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity pool being pulled by whoever holds the LP tokens.

One figure worth sitting with is holder concentration: the top 10 wallets hold 54.7% of supply. That doesn't indicate anything was done improperly, but it does mean a small number of addresses could move a large share of the circulating supply, which can affect price independent of anything the contract code does. With 21,450 holders recorded, distribution beyond the top ten is comparatively wide, though this check does not tell you who those top wallets belong to or whether they are linked.

It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who is behind the project, their track record, their intentions, the token's broader economic design, marketing claims, or any legal or regulatory status. A clean mechanical read does not mean the people involved are trustworthy, and a contract with no exploitable functions can still be part of a project with weak fundamentals or misleading claims made elsewhere.

Before putting money toward this or any token, consider looking into who the top holders are and whether any are known exchange or team wallets, checking whether the liquidity lock or burn can be independently verified on the explorer rather than taken at face value, reviewing the project's official channels and any audit reports from named firms, and reading the token's actual utility and distribution plan rather than relying on marketing material alone.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Ethereum block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 26 Oct 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.