| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 45% | Holder distribution | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 164698 | Token contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 5 Oct 2020 — 2,161 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x6089ee…aa7b06 |
| Deployed by | 0xa47c0b…be7ac5 |
| Holders | 164,698 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf58db6…b645dc | 10.23% |
| #2 | 0x947872…b626cc | 7.89% |
| #3 | 0xfcf15c…2a6fb1 | 4.22% |
| #4 | 0x5e0c3e…794a5f | 4.09% |
| #5 | 0xdbfc56…bc347d | 3.90% |
This automated check scanned the FET contract on Ethereum and returned a score of 13 out of 18. Several findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract's admin mint function is enabled, which means whoever holds the owner or admin keys can create new tokens at will, increasing total supply and potentially diluting the value of tokens already held by others. Transfers can also be paused by the owner, meaning that at any point the ability to send or sell the token could be switched off for all holders, temporarily or otherwise. No address blacklist function was detected on the date of this check, so nothing indicates that individual wallets can be selectively blocked from transacting. The buy and sell simulation found no tax applied and no honeypot behaviour was detected, meaning the token could be sold in the simulation performed. Liquidity is not locked, which means whoever supplied the trading liquidity retains the ability to withdraw it, which can affect the ability to sell at a stable price. Holder concentration is moderate to high, with the top ten wallets controlling 45% of supply, meaning large holders could influence price materially if they sell. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable and was available for this automated review.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not do. This is a mechanical read of the contract's code and on-chain data only. It does not assess the team behind the token, their track record, or whether the identities behind the project are known or anonymous. It does not evaluate tokenomics design, vesting schedules, treasury management, or whether emissions plans are sustainable. It does not assess legal structure, regulatory status, or the intent of the people who deployed or administer the contract. A high or low score here reflects code-level permissions and holder data as they existed at the time of the check, not a judgement on the project as a whole.
Before making any decision, consider looking into who controls the admin and mint keys, and whether they are held by a multisig, a DAO, or a single wallet. Check whether the project has published any commitments regarding future minting or pause powers, and whether liquidity lock plans have been announced or executed since this check was run. Reviewing recent on-chain transaction history for the admin address, and looking for independent audits or community discussion, can also add useful context that this automated check does not cover.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.