| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 60.1% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 59048 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x20e12a…6aa8b8 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 59,048 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x3154cf…0f2c35 | 28.29% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 7.71% |
| #3 · UniswapV2 · contract | 0xc2eab7…cb539d | 6.54% |
| #4 | 0x15da75…dcb0d7 | 3.68% |
| #5 | 0xa023f0…fc947e | 3.27% |
This automated check looked at Mog Coin's contract code and current holder data on Ethereum and returned a score of 14 out of 18. In practical terms, the findings show that on the date of this check, a transfer simulation found the token sellable, with no honeypot behaviour detected. Buy and sell tax were both read from the contract as 0%, meaning no fee is currently coded in on trades. No admin mint function was found, which means the contract does not appear to give the owner a way to create new tokens and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner does not appear able to freeze all transfers. No blacklist function was found, meaning there is no on-chain mechanism visible that would let the owner block specific wallets from trading. The contract is also not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out later by whoever controls it. Source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the actual logic behind the contract can be read by anyone, rather than being hidden.
One figure worth sitting with on its own is that the top 10 holders control 60.1% of the total supply. That is a high concentration: if a small number of wallets move at the same time, it can affect the amount of the token available on the market and its price, regardless of anything the contract code allows or restricts.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics and current holder distribution only — it does not assess who the team behind the project is, their track record, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there are legal obligations or disclosures associated with the project, or the intent behind any of it. A clean contract reading says nothing about whether the people running the project will act in holders' interests. This is also a fully automated check; no person has reviewed this token or vouched for it.
Before putting any money toward this or any token, it's worth looking at who holds those top wallets and whether any are known exchange or liquidity addresses rather than individuals, checking whether liquidity is locked and for how long, looking into the team's public history and any audits of the contract by independent reviewers, and re-running checks like this one periodically, since contract permissions and holder concentration can change over time even when nothing changes in the token's marketing.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.