| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Implementation code | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 27.6% | Holder distribution | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 9264015 | Token contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x95ba4c…e93911 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x807a96…6395d2 — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x435068…4402dd |
| Holders | 9,264,015 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x37305b…fd7341 | 9.18% |
| #2 · contract | 0xe1940f…6929b6 | 3.50% |
| #3 · contract | 0xffa69c…735a5e | 3.26% |
| #4 · contract | 0xad354c…329ef5 | 2.89% |
| #5 · contract | 0x40ec5b…5bbbdf | 2.08% |
This automated check found several capabilities built into the contract that give its administrator a significant degree of control over the token. The contract allows the owner to mint new supply, meaning additional tokens can be created and the total supply increased at the administrator's discretion. Transfers can be paused by the owner, which means the ability to move or sell the token can be temporarily switched off for all holders. The contract also supports blacklisting, so specific wallet addresses can be blocked from transacting. Perhaps most significantly, the contract is an upgradeable proxy, which means a single wallet holds the power to replace the underlying contract code entirely — including removing or altering any of the mechanics listed here, for better or worse, at any future point. None of these capabilities were "detected as currently active against a specific wallet" in this check; they were detected as present in the code, meaning they exist as available functions regardless of whether they are currently being used. Top-10 wallets were found to hold 27.6% of the circulating supply, and the contract source code was verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of review to take place at all.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics as written in code — it does not assess who operates the contract, how that operator has behaved historically, what the token is used for, how it is distributed or marketed, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind it. A contract can score well on this kind of technical check while still carrying risks tied to governance decisions, business practices, or the intentions of whoever controls the admin keys. Conversely, having owner-controlled functions like minting or pausing does not by itself indicate malicious intent — many widely used tokens, including centrally issued stablecoins, are built this way by design.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth looking into who controls the admin and upgrade keys and whether that control sits with a single wallet or a multi-signature arrangement, what the issuer has publicly disclosed about how and when these functions have been used, whether there's independent reporting or audit history covering the contract and its operator, and how concentrated holder wallets are relative to daily trading volume. Reviewing the project's own documentation, any attestations or audits, and independent commentary alongside this check will give a fuller picture than contract mechanics alone can provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.