| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 64.2% | Holder distribution | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1705147 | Token contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb8f226…0dfa08 |
| Holders | 1,705,147 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Dead · burned | 0xdead00…942069 | 41.04% |
| #2 | 0x02e220…4b481e | 6.41% |
| #3 | 0x40b387…18e489 | 4.78% |
| #4 | 0x5a52e9…70efcb | 3.76% |
| #5 | 0xa023f0…fc947e | 2.73% |
This automated check scanned the SHIB contract on Ethereum and scored 14 out of 18 on the mechanics it looks for. In practice, this means a few specific things. The contract was found to be sellable in simulation, meaning tokens can be bought and sold without a hidden block on transactions. Buy and sell tax were both found at 0%, so no built-in fee was detected redirecting a cut of trades to a wallet. No admin mint function was detected, which means the contract owner was not found to have a coded way to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers were not found to be pausable, so there is no detected switch that would let an owner freeze all trading. No address blacklist function was detected, meaning the owner was not found to have a coded way to block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so its logic cannot be swapped out later by whoever controls it. Two things stand out as elevated, not resolved: the top 10 wallets hold 64.2% of supply, which is a concentration level worth noting, and liquidity in the main pool is not locked, though it is spread across 243 providers, which is typical for a token of this size and age and differs from a small, newly launched token where a single unlocked wallet holds the pool.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract code and on-chain data only, on the date it ran. It says nothing about the team behind the token, how tokenomics are structured beyond raw holder percentages, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or the intentions of whoever currently has administrative control, if anyone does. No human reviewed this contract or the project around it; the results come entirely from automated analysis of what the code and chain data show at this moment. Findings can also change if the contract is upgraded, if admin keys move, or if liquidity conditions shift, so a clean result today does not lock in a clean result tomorrow.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking beyond this page. Check whether any admin or deployer wallet still holds special permissions, even if not flagged here, by reviewing the contract on a block explorer. Look at how the top holders are labelled — exchange or treasury wallets concentrated at the top read very differently from unrelated private wallets. Review the liquidity pool composition directly to see how spread out it really is. And look into the project's public history, communications and any independent audits, since none of that is assessed by this tool.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.