| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 32.8% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% burned | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 286 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x83f929…30e6a5 |
| Holders | 286 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0xca1184…975d36 | 24.28% |
| #2 | 0xd8041a…c0d0d8 | 1.55% |
| #3 | 0x72440f…9c2507 | 1.39% |
| #4 | 0xffa6c2…14f857 | 1.28% |
| #5 | 0x0a74bd…b1185c | 0.97% |
This automated check looked at SNOWMOON's contract mechanics on Ethereum and scored 17 out of 18, which reflects the absence of several common risk indicators rather than a guarantee of anything. In practice, this means: a sell simulation went through successfully, so selling does not appear blocked at the contract level as of the date of this check. Buy and sell tax are both set to 0%, meaning no fee is currently being deducted on trades. No admin mint function was detected, so the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable and no blacklist function was found, meaning the owner does not appear able to freeze the contract or block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, so its code cannot be swapped out later by the owner. Liquidity is reported as 100% burned, meaning the tokens backing the trading pool have been sent to an unrecoverable address, which reduces the risk of that liquidity being pulled. Top-10 wallets hold 32.8% of supply, which is a moderate concentration worth keeping in mind, as large coordinated sales from these wallets could affect the price available to other holders.
This check only reads what the smart contract can technically do. It cannot tell you anything about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of other tokens, how the stated tokenomics will actually be used over time, whether there are off-chain agreements, marketing claims, or legal exposure, or what the long-term intent of the holders of that concentrated 32.8% is. A contract with no risky functions detected can still be part of a project that performs poorly or is abandoned; a clean technical read is not a judgement on the people or plans behind it.
Before putting money in, it would be worth looking at the project's public communications and whether the team is identifiable, checking whether the liquidity burn transaction can be independently verified on a block explorer, reviewing how the top holder wallets have behaved historically (are they exchange wallets, locked team allocations, or unknown individual addresses), and searching for any independent discussion of the project outside its own channels. None of this replaces your own judgement, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.