| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 94.3% | Holder distribution | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 44235 | Token contract | 4 Sept 2026 |
This automated check found that USD1 uses an upgradeable proxy structure, which means the underlying logic of the contract can be swapped out by whoever controls the upgrade permissions. In practice, this gives the contract owner the ability to change how the token behaves after you've already bought it — including introducing new rules that were not present when the code was last reviewed. No admin mint function, transfer pause mechanism, or address blacklist was detected on the date of this check, meaning the contract owner does not currently appear able to mint new tokens at will, freeze transfers, or block specific wallets from moving funds. A transfer simulation found the token to be sellable, and no honeypot behaviour was detected. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, so the deployed code can be read and checked against what's publicly listed. Holder concentration is high: the top 10 addresses hold 94.2% of the supply, which means a small number of wallets have outsized influence over what happens if they choose to sell or move large amounts at once.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics as they exist on-chain today — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of delivering on stated plans, how the token's supply and incentives are actually structured, or whether there is any legal entity standing behind it. A contract can score well on mechanical checks like this one and still carry significant risk from factors like team conduct, off-chain promises, or business model. None of that is assessed here, and no human has reviewed this token or vouched for it in any way — this is a fully automated result based on the contract code and current holder data.
Before putting money into this token, it's worth looking into who operates World Liberty Financial and what public information exists about its structure and governance, since the upgradeable proxy means future contract behaviour depends heavily on who controls that upgrade key. It's also worth checking whether that upgrade authority sits behind a multisig or timelock, which would at least slow down or add visibility to any changes. Given the concentration of holdings among a small number of wallets, it may help to look at whether any of those top addresses are known exchange or treasury wallets rather than individual holders. Finally, checking independent sources for news, audits, or community discussion about this specific token can add context that a contract-level scan cannot provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Leave an email or a Telegram chat ID and we will tell you the moment this one does — taxes raised, minting switched on, liquidity unlocked. Free for three contracts, no account and no password.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.