LVX On-Chain Risk Check

Loperax · Ethereum · 0x8bbf6b6d73f4e6f85e222d6626697230a5738627
0 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 2 Nov 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers. This token can’t be sold, so the check is 0, whatever the other signals show.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable No — the sell tax takes the whole sale ChainSift simulation 2 Nov 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 2 Nov 2026
Sell tax 100% ChainSift simulation 2 Nov 2026
Admin mint No data Contract 2 Nov 2026
Transfers pausable No data Contract 2 Nov 2026
Address blacklist No data Contract 2 Nov 2026
Upgradeable proxy No data Contract 2 Nov 2026
Source verified No Block explorer 2 Nov 2026
Top-10 holders 100% Holder distribution 2 Nov 2026
Liquidity locked No LP holders 2 Nov 2026
Holders 18 Token contract 2 Nov 2026

This contract — LVX

Deployed by0xdabb53…a6f6d7
Holders18

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · contract 0xdabb53…a6f6d7 99.94%
#2 · UniswapV2 · contract 0x30126b…24f807 0.04%
#3 · contract 0xe9bd3e…99040c 0.00%
#4 · contract 0x6ae3b6…2919e0 0.00%
#5 · contract 0xa25949…d463f2 0.00%

What this means

This automated check returned a score of 0 out of 18 for LVX (Loperax), and the findings point to serious structural problems within the contract itself. The simulation found that selling is blocked: when a sale is attempted, the contract applies a 100% sell tax, meaning the entire value of any sale is taken rather than returned to the seller. In practice, this means tokens can be bought but not sold back for value — a pattern known as a honeypot. Separately, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, so its underlying logic cannot be read or confirmed line by line; the findings here are based on bytecode behaviour observed in simulation, not a human audit. The top 10 holders were found to control 100% of supply, and with only 18 holders recorded in total, the distribution of this token is highly concentrated. Liquidity was also found not to be locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, independent of the sell-tax issue already identified.

It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract mechanics only — things like tax rates, sell behaviour, verification status, and holder concentration at the time of the check. It does not assess who is behind the project, their track record, their stated plans, the token's economic design beyond the contract code, or whether any marketing claims made about the project are accurate. A contract can show no flags on a mechanical check like this and still carry risks the check wasn't built to detect, just as a contract with flags may have explanations behind them — this report does not determine intent either way. No human has reviewed this contract; all findings come from automated analysis performed on the date of the check, and conditions such as liquidity, tax settings, or holder distribution can change afterward.

Given that selling has been found to be blocked here, it would not be appropriate to suggest testing the contract with a purchase of any size, including a small one — the simulation indicates that value placed into this token through a buy would not be recoverable through a sale. Readers wanting to understand more about this specific contract can look at its verified-or-not status directly on a block explorer, review the liquidity pool's lock status through the relevant LP tracking tool, and examine the holder list to see how concentrated ownership is. Independent research into the team, any official communications, and community discussion elsewhere can provide additional context, though none of that falls within what this contract-mechanics check is designed to confirm.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Ethereum block explorer. The trade simulation (a buy, then a sale an hour later) is run by ChainSift directly on Ethereum — our data source returned none for this contract. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 2 Nov 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.