| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 47.9% | Holder distribution | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 62382 | Token contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 21 Feb 2019 — 2,756 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xaa8727…9b083a |
| Deployed by | 0x146ee7…aed5e2 |
| Holders | 62,382 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x64014e…793464 | 20.29% |
| #2 | 0x76ec5a…78fbd3 | 4.87% |
| #3 | 0xd2b8ec…b54762 | 3.42% |
| #4 | 0xd86fa4…0d3bca | 2.89% |
| #5 | 0xc4f56f…5f6ea8 | 2.77% |
This automated check looked at how the ANKR contract is built and how it behaves, not at who runs the project or what it's for. On the date of this check, no admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner does not appear to hold a built-in ability to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so transfers do not appear to be able to be frozen by an admin. No blacklist function was detected, meaning no on-chain mechanism was found that would let an address be blocked from transacting. The contract is also not upgradeable through a proxy, so its core logic cannot be swapped out later without deploying an entirely new contract. A sell simulation completed successfully with 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected, which is consistent with no honeypot behaviour being found at the time of testing. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code that was reviewed matches what is publicly viewable, which supports but does not by itself prove any of the above.
Two things stand out that a buyer should weigh directly. Liquidity is not locked, which means whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it, and no lock contract or timeframe was found guaranteeing otherwise. Separately, the top 10 holder addresses control 47.9% of the circulating supply, which is a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could influence the market through large sells, regardless of what the contract code allows or restricts.
None of this speaks to who is behind the project, how the token is intended to be used, whether the team has other obligations or a track record, or whether the tokenomics make sense for a long-term holder. A contract with no owner-side red flags detected can still be attached to a project with weak fundamentals, an inactive team, or a token supply schedule that dilutes holders over time through normal, non-malicious mechanisms. This check reads bytecode and on-chain state; it does not read intent, and it involves no human judgement — it is fully automated.
Before putting money in, it would be worth independently verifying who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, checking whether the liquidity pool has a time-locked or multisig arrangement even if no formal lock was detected here, looking at ANKR's actual circulating and total supply schedule, and reviewing the project's own documentation and any independent audits published separately from this contract-level check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.