| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 1 | Token contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 6 Apr 2023 — 1,248 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xd07520…1e234e |
| Deployed by | 0x36e921…83bc27 |
| Holders | 1 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xa03dfe…c2ab16 | 100.00% |
This automated check looked at FIDD's contract mechanics on Ethereum and returned a score of 11 out of 18. Here is what that actually means in practical terms. The contract is built behind an upgradeable proxy, which means the code that governs how the token behaves can be swapped out after the fact by whoever controls the upgrade function — rules that apply today, including the current 0% buy and sell tax, are not necessarily fixed for the future. No admin mint function, transfer pause, or address blacklist was detected on the date of this check, which means the contract does not currently show the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze transfers, or block specific wallets from moving funds. A sell simulation completed successfully, meaning tokens could be sold in that test at the time it was run. Holder concentration is a separate and significant point here: the top 10 holders control 100% of supply, and the data shows only one holder on record, which points to a token that either has not been distributed yet or is held almost entirely by a single wallet or entity.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not tell you. This is a purely mechanical read of the smart contract's code and on-chain state — it does not evaluate who is behind the project, whether "Fidelity" in the name reflects any real association with Fidelity Investments or Fidelity Digital Assets, how tokens are intended to be distributed or used, or what legal structure, if any, sits behind the token. Verified source code means the contract's code is human-readable on the block explorer; it does not mean the code has been assessed for intent, nor does it mean any person or team has reviewed the project. Nothing in this report should be read as a judgement on the people running the project or their plans.
Given the concentration figures and the upgradeable proxy, a few concrete next steps are worth taking before deciding anything. Check whether the project has any official, verifiable link to Fidelity, since a name alone proves nothing. Look up who controls the proxy's upgrade key and whether it sits behind a multisignature wallet or timelock, which would at least slow down unilateral changes. Review the holder distribution directly on a block explorer to see whether supply is genuinely concentrated in one wallet, and search for any official announcements, whitepaper, or audit reports published by the team. None of this constitutes financial advice, and this check does not confirm the token is safe or unsafe to hold.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.