| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Implementation code | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1 | Token contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x36e921…83bc27 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0xd5d941…fe27a3 — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x8ae9cb…4c6753 |
| Holders | 1 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xa03dfe…c2ab16 | 100.00% |
This automated check found several mechanisms built into the FIDD contract that give the contract owner significant control over how the token behaves. The owner can mint new tokens at will, which means the total supply is not fixed and can be increased at the owner's discretion, potentially diluting existing holders. Transfers can be paused by the owner, meaning a wallet holding FIDD could be frozen from moving or selling the token entirely. Perhaps most significant is the upgradeable proxy: this means a single wallet has the power to replace the entire contract's code at any time, including removing or adding any of the behaviours described here — effectively, the rules of the token can be rewritten after the fact. On top of this, the top 10 holders currently control 100% of supply, and the contract shows only one holder on record, indicating that no meaningful distribution has taken place as of the date of this check. No honeypot behaviour was detected in simulation (the token was sellable with 0% buy and sell tax), and no blacklist function was found in the implementation code at the time of the check. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows the code to be read but does not reduce the risks above.
It's important to understand what this check does not tell you. This is an automated, code-level scan — it reads the contract's mechanics and current holder distribution. It does not assess who is behind the project, their intentions, their track record, or whether this is officially connected to Fidelity Investments or any other named entity. It does not evaluate tokenomics, roadmap, legal structure, or whether promotional claims about the token are accurate. A contract can be mechanically similar to many others while differing enormously in who controls it and why.
Given the single holder and 100% concentration figures, this project appears to be at a very early stage, pre-distribution, or possibly a test deployment — this check cannot distinguish between those scenarios. Before considering any transaction, you may want to look for an official announcement from Fidelity confirming this contract address directly on their verified channels, check the contract creation date and transaction history on a block explorer, search for audits or team disclosures, and look at whether the mint and pause functions are controlled by a single wallet or a multi-signature arrangement with time delays. None of these steps constitute investment advice, and this check does not predict future performance or recommend any action.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.