| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | ChainSift simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | ChainSift simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 59.3% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% burned | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 45 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xa209ae…987fdf |
| Holders | 45 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xd0318f…00bbc9 | 19.11% |
| #2 | 0x5215ad…c5fcdb | 13.91% |
| #3 | 0xa5e6e1…36e608 | 5.29% |
| #4 | 0x6701f6…3687a3 | 4.13% |
| #5 | 0x2a535d…791558 | 3.82% |
This automated check gave XChat a score of 2 out of 10, and the findings point to several specific concerns worth understanding in plain terms. The contract includes blacklisting functionality, which means whoever controls it has the technical ability to block specific wallet addresses from transacting with the token — in practice, this could be used to prevent individual holders from selling or moving their tokens, even if the token as a whole remains sellable for others. The contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, meaning only the raw bytecode is visible; this prevented ChainSift's automated reader from confirming or ruling out other mechanics such as admin minting, pausable transfers, or an upgradeable proxy structure, all of which are reported here as "no data" rather than confirmed absent. Holder concentration is also notable: the top 10 wallets hold 59.3% of the supply, across a relatively small base of 45 known holders, which means price movements could be heavily influenced by the actions of a handful of addresses. On a more reassuring note, the simulation run on the date of this check found the token sellable, with 0% buy and sell tax, and liquidity shown as 100% burned — meaning that particular liquidity pool cannot be pulled by whoever created it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not do. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess the team behind the project, their intentions, the token's economic design, marketing claims, or any legal status. A contract can show no dangerous flags today and still be paired with a team that behaves in ways this tool cannot detect, and conversely, flags like blacklisting exist in many legitimate setups for compliance reasons. No human has reviewed this contract or project; the results reflect only what automated analysis of the bytecode and on-chain data could determine on the date of the check.
Given the unverified source code and the blacklist function, it would be reasonable to look further before forming a view: check whether the project has published verified source code since this scan, look into who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, review any available audit reports, and research the team's public identity and track record. Because blacklisting could affect your ability to transact even when the token is broadly sellable, this is one of the more important mechanics to understand fully before committing funds.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.