| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 87% | Holder distribution | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 5580 | Token contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 2 Apr 2025 — 526 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xc33fbc…113018 |
| Deployed by | 0x27e939…3bcda5 |
| Current owner | 0x760eb3…66fb4c |
| Holders | 5,580 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x3ec349…3e22f3 | 54.38% |
| #2 | 0x87f794…28ee39 | 15.48% |
| #3 | 0xd2dd7b…e6869f | 3.17% |
| #4 | 0x65241f…2b80ed | 2.96% |
| #5 | 0x9642b2…2f5d4e | 2.82% |
This automated check scored BTR 11 out of 18 based on contract mechanics visible on-chain at the time of the scan. A few findings are worth translating into plain terms. First, the contract owner can mint new supply — this means the owner has the technical ability to create new BTR tokens at will, which can dilute existing holders' share of the total supply without their consent. Second, the top 10 wallet addresses hold 87% of all tokens, a high concentration that means a small number of holders could sell large amounts at once, which can affect the price available to everyone else. Third, liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it, which could leave holders unable to sell their tokens through that pool. On the more reassuring side, no buy or sell tax was detected, transfer simulation indicates the token is sellable, no pause or blacklist function was found, the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning its logic can be publicly inspected. None of these absences prove a flag will never appear — they mean it was not detected on the date of this check.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there is a whitepaper or roadmap that matches reality, or whether any marketing claims are accurate. It cannot assess intent, and it does not constitute a judgement on whether BTR is trustworthy, fraudulent, or a good or bad use of money. A verified, mintable, unlocked contract can belong to a project with entirely reasonable explanations for each of those design choices, just as it can belong to one without.
Before putting any money toward this token, it would be worth looking into who the team is and whether they are publicly identifiable, checking whether there is a locked liquidity contract on a service like Unicron or Team Finance despite what this scan found, reviewing the token's distribution history for large recent transfers among top holders, reading any available audit reports from named third-party firms, and searching independently for community discussion or news about BTR outside of the project's own channels.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.