| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 90.7% | Holder distribution | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 2212 | Token contract | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x501007…7f4545 |
| Current owner | 0x3b1818…d49fcd |
| Holders | 2,212 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xcf8ce5…3ffa73 | 25.49% |
| #2 | 0x7f7348…51b973 | 19.39% |
| #3 | 0x3d54b8…a818ed | 10.17% |
| #4 | 0x28c6c0…f21d60 | 9.17% |
| #5 | 0x8c2d0d…37f51c | 7.09% |
This automated check scanned the SOPH contract on Ethereum and produced a score of 12 out of 18. In practical terms, a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and no admin mint function, no transfer-pausing function, and no address blacklist function were detected in the contract as of the date of this check. That means, based on what was found, the contract owner does not currently appear able to freeze wallets, stop trading, or print new tokens at will. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, which means its code cannot be swapped out later for different logic without deploying an entirely new contract. Source code is verified on the block explorer, so the logic behind these findings can be independently read by anyone.
Two points stand out as higher risk. Top-10 holders control 90.7% of the total supply, which is a very high concentration — if a small number of wallets hold that much of the token, their buying or selling decisions can move the price sharply and unpredictably, regardless of anything in the contract code itself. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it, which can sharply reduce the ability to sell or cause the price to collapse. Buy and sell tax data was not available, so any fee taken on trades could not be confirmed either way.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. It only reads contract mechanics — the functions written into the code and what they technically allow. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there are legal or regulatory obligations attached, or what the team's actual intentions are. No human has reviewed this contract or the project around it; this is an automated read of on-chain data only, and it reflects conditions on the day it was run, not a permanent guarantee.
Before considering any transaction, it would be sensible to look up who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, check whether the liquidity pool tokens are locked or held by an identifiable party, look for a published team, audit reports, and social presence, and search independently for any prior incidents linked to this contract or its deployer address. Holder concentration and unlocked liquidity are the kind of conditions that are worth understanding fully before any capital is committed.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.