| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 30.7% | Holder distribution | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100%, end date unknown | LP holders · TeamFinance | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 467 | Token contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x21aa42…c127f7 |
| Holders | 467 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0x22e15b…468557 | 13.99% |
| #2 | 0x5f8deb…db6d7d | 2.26% |
| #3 | 0x70f9fe…94571b | 2.18% |
| #4 | 0x13d66c…64fdb4 | 2.04% |
| #5 | 0x781620…6e099a | 2.00% |
This automated check on YMB found that a simulated sell transaction completed successfully, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of the scan. Buy and sell tax are both set to 0% in the contract code, and no functions were found that would let the contract owner mint new tokens, pause transfers, or blacklist specific wallet addresses. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, which means its logic cannot be swapped out for different code after deployment. Taken together, these findings indicate that, as read from the contract mechanics on the date of this check, the owner does not appear to retain the specific controls this scan looks for. Liquidity is reported as 100% locked, though the lock's end date is unknown, so there is no visibility into when that liquidity could become accessible again. Top-10 wallets hold 30.7% of the supply, which is a concentration level worth noting, since large coordinated sales by a small number of holders can affect the amount of liquidity available to other sellers.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — no person has reviewed this token, and nothing here evaluates the team behind it, their identity or track record, the tokenomics or distribution plan, any legal structure, or the intent behind the project. A contract can show no technical red flags on this list and still carry risk from factors entirely outside the contract itself, such as misleading marketing, concentrated off-chain agreements between holders, or a team that has made no long-term commitments.
Before putting any money toward this token, it's worth looking into who is behind the project and whether they're identifiable or pseudonymous, checking the liquidity lock directly on the locking platform (TeamFinance, in this case) to see the actual unlock date rather than relying on "locked" as a permanent state, reviewing the token's social channels and any available audit reports from independent firms, and looking at how the top holders acquired their tokens and whether their wallets have been moving. None of these steps are covered by this scan, and none of the findings above should be read as an endorsement or a warning to act — they describe what the contract's code permits and what was observed at the time of the check, nothing more.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.