| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 42.7% | Holder distribution | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 127060 | Token contract | 21 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf942db…f4a6bd |
| Current owner | 0xc2edad…a888cd |
| Holders | 127,060 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5a52e9…70efcb | 10.02% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 6.72% |
| #3 | 0x879824…ff4272 | 6.11% |
| #4 | 0xa4b956…e1bf30 | 4.47% |
| #5 | 0x611f7b…dfb09d | 3.55% |
This automated check looked at the SushiToken contract on Ethereum and scored it 14 out of 18 on the mechanics it examined. Three things stand out from the findings. First, the contract's owner retains the ability to mint new tokens at will, which means the total supply is not fixed and could be increased by whoever controls that admin function, potentially diluting existing holders. Second, the top 10 wallet addresses hold 42.7% of all tokens, a concentration level that means a small number of holders could move large amounts of the token in a single transaction, which can affect price and liquidity. Third, the contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the actual code behind the token can be read and matched against what's publicly shown, rather than being hidden or obscured. On the more reassuring side, no buy/sell blocking, transfer pausing, or address blacklisting functions were detected in the contract as it stands, and a transfer simulation on the day of this check found the token sellable with no honeypot behaviour detected. Tax data on buys and sells was not available from this check's sources.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not know who the SushiToken team is, whether they have a track record, how the token's economics are designed to function over time, or what legal or regulatory status the project holds anywhere. A contract can score well on mechanics like this one while the people behind it, the incentive structure, or the broader business plan carry risks that no amount of code-reading will surface. Equally, mint ability and holder concentration are described here as capabilities and current conditions, not as evidence of intent — the check cannot tell you why the owner retains minting rights or what the large holders plan to do with their positions.
Before putting any money toward this or any token, it's worth looking beyond this page. Check whether the mint function is controlled by a single wallet or a multisig, and whether there's a public commitment (timelock, renounced ownership, or similar) limiting how it can be used. Look at where the top holders' tokens came from — exchange wallets, team allocations, and liquidity pools all show up in "top 10" figures but mean very different things. Read the project's own documentation on supply schedule and token utility, search for independent audits of the contract, and check trading volume and liquidity depth on decentralized exchanges rather than relying on holder count alone. None of this check's findings should be read as a signal to buy or avoid the token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.